On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 12:42:00AM -0800, Alejandro Forero Cuervo wrote: > I think this wouldn't be very hard to do, since they would all behave > pretty much in the same way. We can probably just keep a list with > them (ie. '(string class method)) that we add to as needed. > > That is, I think you're assuming that adding new ones is hard, and I'm > just letting you know that nah, once everything is in place, it would > be rather easy. :-) > > So I'll add support for <string>, <class> and <method>. > > Does that sound good to you?
I'm losing sight of the changes a bit. Could you please update the wiki-syntax doc so we have something to work with for the hackathon? Cheers, Peter -- http://sjamaan.ath.cx -- "The process of preparing programs for a digital computer is especially attractive, not only because it can be economically and scientifically rewarding, but also because it can be an aesthetic experience much like composing poetry or music." -- Donald Knuth
pgpph12y3m89V.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Chicken-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users
