On 2/21/08, Alejandro Forero Cuervo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I think we should stick to <proc>, <macro> and so on. They are easier > to type than <def type="proc">, <def type="macro"> and so on.
I agree. > What if instead of <signature type="string"> and <def type="string"> > we simply use <string>? Would that work? Functionally yes, but I can only think of one person who has ever used 'string' in an egg: myself. In my opinion, the <def> tag should be there for really unusual cases such as that, since we can't think of every type of definition. Check out the sqlite3-tinyclos doc for another example; Thomas thought up 'class' and 'method', which were not in eggdoc. (The 'signature' type was put in eggdoc for just that case.) I still think <def> is useful for unusual or unimplemented definitions, unless you really want to restrict people to a few major definition types (or update svnwiki every time someone thinks of a new one). _______________________________________________ Chicken-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users
