On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 2:35 PM, Alejandro Forero Cuervo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Is that possible, given that reading the Scheme file may require > > custom syntax? > > It may not be possible to do it reliably, but if we get just 50% of > the cases right, that's an improvement. I suspect with some lovin' we > should be able to get 90% or so. :-)
I agree, love is the answer. ;-) Some day, we might want to offer an alternate way of marking which procs should be indexed, or providing a formal exports list, like the (declare ) form but for interpreted files as well. That would cover the cases where automated indexing is intractable. But yes, 50% is a good target for a first attempt. Graham _______________________________________________ Chicken-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users
