On Mon, Aug 25, 2008 at 5:14 PM, Peter Bex <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Perhaps you (or someone else on the list?) can think of a better name > that can be prefixed, to remove all confusion? Ideally it'd be something > which has been done before in Scheme, or failing that, something people > would have absolutely no preconceptions about. SRFI-57, which amongst other things describes a functional update procedure on records, uses the name record-update, so maybe a name like update-<type> would fit well. Another name I'd feel comfortable using would be make-<type>-from, which means "make a new type based on an existing instance of that type". _______________________________________________ Chicken-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users
