On Mon, 25 Aug 2008, Alan Post wrote:
On Mon, Aug 25, 2008 at 04:31:42PM -0400, John Cowan wrote:
Peter Bex scripsit:
Perhaps you (or someone else on the list?) can think of a better name
that can be prefixed, to remove all confusion? Ideally it'd be something
which has been done before in Scheme, or failing that, something people
would have absolutely no preconceptions about.
"clone-<type>" would fit the latter description, or how about
"make-duplicate-<type>"?
I'll also propose transmogrify-<type> and
make-duplicate-with-ethicator-<type>.
a clone by any other name is no defeat.
-elf
who wants to know why we're babbling about procedure names when there's
porting to be done
_______________________________________________
Chicken-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users
