On Mon, Aug 25, 2008 at 05:49:14PM -0300, Alonso Andres wrote: > On Mon, Aug 25, 2008 at 5:14 PM, Peter Bex <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Perhaps you (or someone else on the list?) can think of a better name > > that can be prefixed, to remove all confusion? Ideally it'd be something > > which has been done before in Scheme, or failing that, something people > > would have absolutely no preconceptions about. > > SRFI-57, which amongst other things describes a functional update > procedure on records, uses the name record-update, so maybe a name > like update-<type> would fit well.
I like this proposal best. It's been checked in and tagged. Should appear soon as version 1.2. Cheers, Peter -- http://sjamaan.ath.cx -- "The process of preparing programs for a digital computer is especially attractive, not only because it can be economically and scientifically rewarding, but also because it can be an aesthetic experience much like composing poetry or music." -- Donald Knuth
pgpZgrUc10b58.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Chicken-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users
