Yes it would be nice but a compete waste if his time. Pam refuses to be 
educated. That's the difference between ignorance and stupidity. Ignorance 
doesn't know better. Stupidity refuses to. 

Now, I'm off to a dog show with my armpit piranha. :-)

Sent from Carey's iPhone

On Apr 27, 2012, at 11:41 AM, Becky <[email protected]> wrote:

> 
> 
> Wouldn't it be great for Cesar Milan to get hold of this thread, he could 
> spread light on this topic, I am sure.  
> 
>                    Becky & the girls
> 
> Sent from Becky's iPhone 
> 
> On Apr 27, 2012, at 11:29 AM, Becky <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
>> Well said Carey.  I totally agree.
>> 
>>                Becky & the girls
>> 
>> Sent from Becky's iPhone 
>> 
>> On Apr 27, 2012, at 10:50 AM, Carey Smith <[email protected]> wrote:
>> 
>>>  
>>> OMG, I cannot hold back. *I* am "one of those people" and I have been 
>>> fighting just as hard for the past 15 years to repeal and prevent any Breed 
>>> Specific Legislation. The IGNORANCE being shown on this board is 
>>> horrifying. The American Pit Bull Terrier, Staffordshire Bull Terriers and 
>>> American Staffordshire Terriers WERE originally bred for pit fighting and 
>>> bull baiting. They were NOT EVER bred to be human aggressive--- and, in 
>>> fact, ANY "pit bull" (which is just a catchall term for the bull & terrier 
>>> breeds) that showed human aggression was KILLED by its owner. Did you read 
>>> that--- the HUMAN AGGRESSIVE DOGS WERE CULLED. The Little Rascals dog was a 
>>> PIT BULL, Helen Keller had a PIT BULL (and Akita), the most decorated war 
>>> dog EVER was Stubby, a PIT BULL. I could go on and on and on......
>>> But, what happened in the 80's was a certain segment of the popluation-- 
>>> one that is fond of gang life, drugs, and wearing their pants around their 
>>> knees--- discovered the breed. They started breeding them for the very 
>>> trait that was UNNATURAL to the breed-- human aggression. In order to do 
>>> so, they had to MIX THEM with other, naturally human aggressive breeds. I'm 
>>> not aware of a SINGLE fatal dog attack (or even non fatal) that involves an 
>>> AKC REGISTERED, PUREBRED APBT, SBT or AST. NOT ONE. The attacks you read 
>>> about almost always involve MIXED BREED DOGS that may, or may not, be mixed 
>>> with pit bulls. BUT, since the bull & terrier breeds are NOT inherently 
>>> human aggressive, why isn't whatever they are mixed with being blamed?!?!
>>> And this is another issue that yanks my chain--- ANIMAL AGGRESSION AND 
>>> HUMAN AGGRESSION are 2 *completely* different things. ONE IS NOT THE SAME 
>>> AS THE OTHER and a dog that kills a cat is no more prone to hurt a human 
>>> than any other dog!!!
>>> In a dog's eyes, a small, jumpy, yappy chihuahua is no different than a cat 
>>> or any other prey animal, it is OUR responsibilty as a toy dog owner to 
>>> keep them OUT of harm's way and to NOT ALLOW them to antagonize other dogs 
>>> of any breed!!!
>>>  
>>> Also, there is NO SUCH THING as a "locking jaw"-- the bull & terrier 
>>> anatomy and physiology is THE SAME as any other breed of dog.
>>>  
>>> My blood pressure is SO up!
>>> 
>>> On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 9:57 AM, Pam Dean <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> Why would anyone deliberately choose to have an animal with this viscious, 
>>> unpredictable temperament in their lives?? Yes you can take 
>>> precautions..chain the dog..keep it separated..train it..etc.  but they 
>>> still maim and kill.  Children, adults, pets, it doesn't seem to matter.  
>>> They are like a ticking time bomb. I personally am participating and 
>>> helping in any and all legislation and fund raising and petitions that will 
>>> get these dogs out of residences so the public is not subjected to the 
>>> horror they can cause.  We are the victims until this is accomplished and 
>>> have to live with the memories.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> -- 
>>> Carey 
>>> 
>>> 
>> =
> 
> 
> 
> =

Reply via email to