I was able to get very consistent results before with just TestShell on Mac running the mozilla page-cycler test locally. Would using TestShell instead of Chromium help, or do you want me to try your patch on Mac?
Let me know. On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 2:08 PM, Marc-Andre Decoste <[email protected]> wrote: > Salut, > I've been trying to locally collect performance data to confirm whether > this was a good enough improvement or not and I can't seem to get consistent > enough results on my machine to draw a conclusion... Some things look > faster, and others look slower, but I sometimes get faster results with the > resize corner enabled, compare to disabled (which doesn't really make > sense)... So I don't think I can rely on these numbers... > So I decided that I will go through with the code review of the changes, > and if Adam and Darin are happy with it, I will commit and monitor the > performance dashboard to see how it goes there... If it goes bad, I'll > revert... And if it goes well... I'll scream my happiness as loud as I can > (and those who know me a bit, know that I CAN be pretty LOUD!!! ;-)... > BYE > MAD > > On Fri, May 1, 2009 at 1:00 PM, Adam Langley <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> On Fri, May 1, 2009 at 9:06 AM, Marc-Andre Decoste <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> > Salut Evan, >> > thanks, I will do that... And the results seems better than I >> > initially >> > thought... >> >> If you get performance improvements, please do commit :) >> >> Evan is correct that Darin needs to check this over, but I'll happy >> code review everything where I can. >> >> >> AGL > > -- Mike Pinkerton Mac Weenie [email protected] --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ Chromium Developers mailing list: [email protected] View archives, change email options, or unsubscribe: http://groups.google.com/group/chromium-dev -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
