On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 2:52 PM, Darin Fisher <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 2:02 PM, Peter Kasting <[email protected]>wrote: > >> On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 1:49 PM, Jeremy Orlow <[email protected]>wrote: >> >>> Here comes the bike shedding >> >> >> Yes, Evan already concluded that was where we were. >> >> RELEASE_NOTES= >>> >> >> I thought the conclusion was that people should just write better commit >> messages? Maybe I'm wrong. >> >> I'd almost prefer: >> >> <Replace this with one-line summary of your change> >> >> <Replace this with more details as needed> >> >> BUG= >> TEST= >> >> ...although I also agree with you that deleting instruction can be really >> annoying. >> >> PK >> > > > I like the suggestion of a short (one line) summary followed by a > paragraph. I also like the BUG=, TEST= fields. What about R=/TBR=? > Is this something people typically grep for? If not, then I think the codereview.chromium.org link is enough. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ Chromium Developers mailing list: [email protected] View archives, change email options, or unsubscribe: http://groups.google.com/group/chromium-dev -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
