Does the debugger integration work without the project files?
-Ben
On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 6:20 PM, Evan Stade<est...@chromium.org> wrote:
> yea I noticed that KDevelop does intellisense much better than MS does
> intellisense (all I had to do was set the header includes path to
> src/, and it was essentially instant to parse the symbols). I'm not
> sure what the point of a generator for it would be though. What
> advantage is there to building in KDevelop rather than from terminal?
>
> -- Evan Stade
>
>
>
> On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 5:41 PM, Ben Goodger (Google)<b...@chromium.org>
> wrote:
>>
>> Much encouragement to anyone that wants to implement a KDevelop generator.
>>
>> -Ben
>>
>> On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 5:34 PM, Dan Kegel<d...@kegel.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> Nesting. CMake claims to be able to generate build configs in all
>>> sorts of formats, and so does gyp. It would just be fun to
>>> see CMake dancing to gyp's tune, or vice versa.
>>>
>>> But you're right, I don't think it'd be particularly useful.
>>> It'd be more interesting to understand the originally reported problem,
>>> "pain on for example xcode or kdevelop users".
>>> What is the problem, again?
>>> Does the OP want xcode or kdevelop to run gyp when the user starts a build?
>>>
>>> On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 5:24 PM, Steven Knight<s...@google.com> wrote:
>>>> What's the coolness here?
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 11:58 AM, Dan Kegel <d...@kegel.com> wrote:
>>>>> In particular, a CMake backend for gyp might be cool.
>>>
>>> >
>>>
>>
>> >>
>>
>
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
Chromium Developers mailing list: chromium-dev@googlegroups.com
View archives, change email options, or unsubscribe:
http://groups.google.com/group/chromium-dev
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
