Does the debugger integration work without the project files? -Ben
On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 6:20 PM, Evan Stade<[email protected]> wrote: > yea I noticed that KDevelop does intellisense much better than MS does > intellisense (all I had to do was set the header includes path to > src/, and it was essentially instant to parse the symbols). I'm not > sure what the point of a generator for it would be though. What > advantage is there to building in KDevelop rather than from terminal? > > -- Evan Stade > > > > On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 5:41 PM, Ben Goodger (Google)<[email protected]> > wrote: >> >> Much encouragement to anyone that wants to implement a KDevelop generator. >> >> -Ben >> >> On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 5:34 PM, Dan Kegel<[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> Nesting. CMake claims to be able to generate build configs in all >>> sorts of formats, and so does gyp. It would just be fun to >>> see CMake dancing to gyp's tune, or vice versa. >>> >>> But you're right, I don't think it'd be particularly useful. >>> It'd be more interesting to understand the originally reported problem, >>> "pain on for example xcode or kdevelop users". >>> What is the problem, again? >>> Does the OP want xcode or kdevelop to run gyp when the user starts a build? >>> >>> On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 5:24 PM, Steven Knight<[email protected]> wrote: >>>> What's the coolness here? >>>> >>>> On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 11:58 AM, Dan Kegel <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> In particular, a CMake backend for gyp might be cool. >>> >>> > >>> >> >> >> >> > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ Chromium Developers mailing list: [email protected] View archives, change email options, or unsubscribe: http://groups.google.com/group/chromium-dev -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
