On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 6:24 PM, Ben Goodger (Google)<[email protected]> wrote: > Does the debugger integration work without the project files? > > -Ben
have not tried. > > On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 6:20 PM, Evan Stade<[email protected]> wrote: >> yea I noticed that KDevelop does intellisense much better than MS does >> intellisense (all I had to do was set the header includes path to >> src/, and it was essentially instant to parse the symbols). I'm not >> sure what the point of a generator for it would be though. What >> advantage is there to building in KDevelop rather than from terminal? >> >> -- Evan Stade >> >> >> >> On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 5:41 PM, Ben Goodger (Google)<[email protected]> >> wrote: >>> >>> Much encouragement to anyone that wants to implement a KDevelop generator. >>> >>> -Ben >>> >>> On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 5:34 PM, Dan Kegel<[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>> Nesting. CMake claims to be able to generate build configs in all >>>> sorts of formats, and so does gyp. It would just be fun to >>>> see CMake dancing to gyp's tune, or vice versa. >>>> >>>> But you're right, I don't think it'd be particularly useful. >>>> It'd be more interesting to understand the originally reported problem, >>>> "pain on for example xcode or kdevelop users". >>>> What is the problem, again? >>>> Does the OP want xcode or kdevelop to run gyp when the user starts a build? >>>> >>>> On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 5:24 PM, Steven Knight<[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> What's the coolness here? >>>>> >>>>> On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 11:58 AM, Dan Kegel <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>> In particular, a CMake backend for gyp might be cool. >>>> >>>> > >>>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >> > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ Chromium Developers mailing list: [email protected] View archives, change email options, or unsubscribe: http://groups.google.com/group/chromium-dev -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
