I would like to make this switch, but it is not yet reliable. I don't want build bots failing because of dependency bugs. (Heh, heaven forbid we sometimes need to click a hypothetical "clobber" checkbox on the buildbots to work around a build system issue! :P)
I'd been using the "makebuild" label, though most bugs have just been reported to me directly (special thanks to benl and davemoore for tracking down some problems for me): http://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues/list?can=1&q=makebuild Dean told me he has his build alias just always run make twice when he builds, which is pretty tragic to me, but he says it's still faster than scons. :\ On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 2:07 PM, Lei Zhang<thes...@chromium.org> wrote: > > Hi, > > On Linux, building with make is a lot faster than build with hammer. > Ever since I switched to the make build on Linux, I've never looked > back. I imagine many other Linux developers are also using make, and > we have been using the make build without any major problems for a few > months now. So I wonder, is it time to switch our build bots to make > and update the Linux build instructions? > > - Lei > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ Chromium Developers mailing list: chromium-dev@googlegroups.com View archives, change email options, or unsubscribe: http://groups.google.com/group/chromium-dev -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
