The Omnibox widget code is already very involved, and I don't think it
is a good idea to add any more complexity or additional modes.

Chromium of course is open source, which is a very hidden form of configuration.

Good luck,
-- dean

On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 8:57 AM, JT Olds <[email protected]> wrote:
> Can we please make it configurable? I hate the click once select all
> thing. It really drives me nuts. Chromium is so nice otherwise.
>
> I don't care how hidden of a configuration parameter it is, just so
> long as I can change it.
>
> On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 9:12 AM, Dean McNamee<[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> A bug tracker is the right place to have this discussion, and I see
>> you've filed 19508 which was closed WontFix.  I appreciate your
>> opinion and dedication to Linux.  We have plenty of Linux users who
>> have gotten adjusted to this behavior and prefer it.  There is no
>> clear answer, which is why there has been so much discussion.  I am
>> not going to try to repeat all of that here.  You can also read bug
>> 13561, which was a previous round of something similar.
>>
>> Basically you have to stop thinking of the Omnibox as an already
>> existing GTK widget, and think of it as a new widget designed
>> specifically for optimizing input of URLs.  That means there is no
>> conventions for this new type of widget.  GtkEntry / etc were
>> optimized for clicking a text box and editing / inserting text.  The
>> Omnibox widget is optimized for clicking and replacing text.  We
>> believe this behavior makes sense for how people input URLs.
>>
>> On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 11:38 PM, alenpeacock <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Aug 20, 5:40 pm, Dean McNamee <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>> This thread is massive.  Having been the one who wrote the majority of
>>>> the Omnibox code on Linux, I can promise you that this debate has
>>>> already happened about 15 times previously.  I'm not sure there is any
>>>> more information here, we've already decided how we want things to
>>>> work.
>>>
>>> Doesn't the fact that this debate has happened 15 times already raise
>>> a red flag for everyone? I mean, to me, that smells like - as they say
>>> on the internets - "you're doing it wrong."
>>>
>>> I hate that we're distracting you guys once again on an issue that you
>>> all thought was settled, but I can also guarantee that you'll see it
>>> another 115 times, until it starts to conform with conventions. And
>>> I'd really hate for us boneheaded non-windows users to keep wasting
>>> your attention and deflecting your energy when you could be using it
>>> instead to take care of all those other things that I'm sure are on
>>> your plates. We're on your side, we really are! I don't want to go
>>> back to Firefox.
>>>
>>> Please reconsider.
>>> >
>>>
>>
>> >>
>>
>

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
Chromium Developers mailing list: [email protected] 
View archives, change email options, or unsubscribe: 
    http://groups.google.com/group/chromium-dev
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to