I think this is one of those things that aren't worth the effort. Brett's change was also to fix other bugs, so it wasn't just for this. I'd be surprised if people spend time to fix bugs solely for this.
On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 10:23 AM, Avi Drissman <[email protected]> wrote: > I've heard people proclaim the principle of being able to copy a profile > across systems as being a deciding factor for certain changes (e.g. the > history epoch change). However, it doesn't seem to be universally held or > obeyed, and I'm not sure to the extent to which it can be obeyed. So some > questions: > > - Is "profile platform independence" a guiding principle? > - To what extent do we work to make it reality? > - In the cases where it can't be kept (e.g. download folder path) should we > keep a copy for each platform? > - Is it worth rewriting today's code that doesn't conform (e.g. extensions > and themes which use full paths and platform path separators)? > > Avi > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ Chromium Developers mailing list: [email protected] View archives, change email options, or unsubscribe: http://groups.google.com/group/chromium-dev -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
