On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 10:23 AM, Avi Drissman <[email protected]> wrote:
> I've heard people proclaim the principle of being able to copy a profile > across systems as being a deciding factor for certain changes (e.g. the > history epoch change). However, it doesn't seem to be universally held or > obeyed, and I'm not sure to the extent to which it can be obeyed. So some > questions: > > - Is "profile platform independence" a guiding principle? > Yes, sort of. > - To what extent do we work to make it reality? > Not as much as we probably should. > - In the cases where it can't be kept (e.g. download folder path) should we > keep a copy for each platform? > Good question. That seems fairly reasonable. > - Is it worth rewriting today's code that doesn't conform (e.g. extensions > and themes which use full paths and platform path separators)? > Is is a bug if we store absolute file paths in the profile directory. You should at least be able to copy it from one directory to another on your system. -Darin --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ Chromium Developers mailing list: [email protected] View archives, change email options, or unsubscribe: http://groups.google.com/group/chromium-dev -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
