On Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 7:07 AM, Amanda Walker <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 3:11 AM, Darin Fisher <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Do websites provide users with previous versions after overhauling their >> UX? Some do (gmail seems to), but most do not. You just get to surf the >> latest. Hopefully, the website changes for the better. That's our burden >> to bear. > > > And other browsers are just a double-click away :-). One difference > between the NTP and a random website is that users think of the NTP as their > content (see for example the wording in the complaint from Mike's sister at > the start of this thread). Web sites that show user-generated (or in this > case, user-arranged) content tend to get more complaints about large visual > changes than more passive or static sites (example: see all of the uproar > whenever Facebook changes their UI). > > Personally, I like the latest version of the NTP, but I would be wary of > lumping it in with websites in general when we're trying to understand user > expectations. > > --Amanda > > My comment applied to the entire browser. We silently update it just like websites are silently updated. -Darin --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ Chromium Developers mailing list: [email protected] View archives, change email options, or unsubscribe: http://groups.google.com/group/chromium-dev -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
