Sorry about that. I usually include that with any feedback I give but 
spaced it out completely this time.

And please excuse the overabundance of info here but I'm sure you get 
tired of getting too little info so I thought I'd make up for it. ;) 
Please see notes at bottom of spec list.

***
OS
***
OS Name    Microsoft Windows XP Professional
Version    5.1.2600 Service Pack 3 Build 2600
***
PC
***
System Manufacturer    HP Pavilion 061
System Model    PC111A-ABA a645c
Processor    x86 Family 6 Model 10 Stepping 0 AuthenticAMD ~2200 Mhz 
(AMD 3200+ [Rough equiv. to P4 3.0 ghz])
Total Physical Memory    1,024.00 MB
**********************
Video (admittedly cheap card located in AGP slot)
**********************
Name    XGI Volari Family v1.16.02.D
PNP Device ID    
PCI\VEN_1023&DEV_2200&SUBSYS_22001023&REV_02\4&1FEB96E4&0&0008
Adapter Type    XGI Volari-V3/XGI Volari-XP5, XGI Technology, Inc. 
compatible
Adapter Description    XGI Volari Family v1.16.02.D
Adapter RAM    128.00 MB (134,217,728 bytes)
********************
Shockwave Flash (saw the same performance with the Flash 9.0.124 and the 
08/11/08 Flash 10 release as well as the latest 09/15/08 release)
********************
File name: npswf32.dll
Shockwave Flash 10.0 r12 (09/15/08 release)
MIME Type    Description    Suffixes    Enabled
application/x-shockwave-flash    Adobe Flash movie    swf    Yes
application/futuresplash    FutureSplash movie    spl    Yes
*************
Chromium
*************
Chromium:    0.3.154.0 (Developer Build 2548)
WebKit:    525.19
V8:    0.3.2
User Agent:    Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US) 
AppleWebKit/525.19 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/0.3.154.0 Safari/525.19

*Notes:*

Current apps running:

 >> Avast! 4.8 anti-virus/anti-virus/ suite (also turned this off during 
troubleshooting).
 >> ZoneAlarm free basic firewall (also tested with Comodo Firewall PRO 
3.0.*, Windows Firewall and no firewall)

Saw the same Flash problems with Chrome beta versions *.27, *.29, *.30 
and Chromium builds 0.2.152.1 (2146?),  2545 and 2548.

Hope this helps. I'm also running SysIternals' Process Explorer and 
although I don't know everything about threads and the like I'll gladly 
provide any info you may wish if you let me know what you want me to 
look for.



On 9/24/2008 11:50 AM, Glenn Wilson wrote:
> If you wouldn't mind, would you post your system specs?  Specifically,
>
> * CPU
> * RAM
> * OS Version
> * Flash Version
> * Chrome/Chromium Version
> * What other applications or plug-ins you might have running
>
> This will certainly help us reproduce and fix this.  Thanks!
>
> Glenn
>
> On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 7:32 AM, Kirk M <[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote:
>
>
>     I have seen this as well and not only having the Flash plugin
>     crash but
>     the entire browser as well. I tested this with Flash versions 9.0.124,
>     10 beta (8/18/08) and 10 beta (9/15/08). Behavior is basically the
>     same
>     using all 3 versions. This behavior did not improve with Dev version
>     0.2.152.1 <http://0.2.152.1> either. I keep SysInternals' Process
>     Explorer running in the
>     Tray and can always tell when Flash is causing trouble when the
>     (single
>     core) CPU shoots to 100%. The browser becomes unresponsive (as
>     does the
>     entire OS at times) however, the misbehaving website/plugin dialog box
>     for the Flash plugin only comes up once in awhile in these cases and
>     that usually takes a couple of minutes to happen (long time to
>     wait when
>     one is cooking their CPU).
>
>     The Flash plugin for Chrome I believe is the same one that Firefox and
>     Opera make use of and is admittedly known for it's poor quality as
>     compared to the version for IE. Because of this, Opera and Firefox has
>     always had significantly worse performance with Flash based media than
>     IE. Obviously Chrome suffers from the same thing but much worse.
>
>     On 9/24/2008 12:54 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>     <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>     > ... inside Chrome 0.2.149.30 <http://0.2.149.30>
>     > have others seen this?
>     > >
>     >
>     >
>
>
>
>
> >

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Chromium-discuss" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/chromium-discuss?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to