Ugh!!! I am still getting shockwave plug-in crashes with the latest release. :-(
I just submitted the report in the issue tracker as you suggested. On Oct 6, 11:43 am, "Glenn Wilson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi everyone, > The earlier link I sent out was just a snapshot of our progress, but isn't a > full release, so I wouldn't recommend using it permanently. > > The good news is that you can get these fixes into your "main" installation > of Chrome by subscribing to the dev channel. The dev channel is where we > publish new, frequent releases. The patches that potentially improved > Plug-in (Flash) performance are in the latest dev release, 0.3.154, so if > you subscribe, you should get the fixes right away. > > Information and instructions about subscribing to the dev channel are > here:http://dev.chromium.org/getting-involved/dev-channel/ > If you'd like to have these fixes in your Chrome installation, and don't > mind getting the latest and greatest changes early, then please follow the > instructions at this link to subscribe. > > We're continuing to work on Plug-in problems, so if you find problems (such > as Facebook Attack), please post them in the issue > tracker:http://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues/entry > > Thanks for all of your feedback!! > > Glenn > > On Sun, Oct 5, 2008 at 8:36 PM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I tried the download, but found the plugin to be even less responsive > > when playing Facebook Attack. It didn't crash totally, as the beta > > build does on occasion, however it didn't want to accept my input in a > > reasonable timeframe. > > > On Oct 4, 12:21 am, "Glenn Wilson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Hi Gene, Kirk & Daniel, > > > We have a potential fix for this issue in a recent build. If you would, > > > please try it out: > > > >http://build.chromium.org/buildbot/snapshots/chromium-rel-xp/2744/chr... > > > > No need to uninstall Chrome, just download and unzip this file and run > > > "chrome.exe" inside the extracted folder. > > > Please give this a try and let us know if this improves the issues you're > > > seeing. > > > > Thanks for the report! > > > > Glenn > > > > On Fri, Oct 3, 2008 at 6:14 AM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > I have the exact same issues as explained by Kirk M. > > > > > Here are my specs: > > > > > Pentium 4 CPU 2.4Ghz > > > > > 1.49 GB Ram > > > > > Windows XP Service Pack 3 Build 2600 > > > > > Chrome Official Build 2200 > > > > Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US) AppleWebKit/525.13 > > > > (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/0.2.149.30 Safari/525.13 > > > > > Other apps: Google updater, AVG updater, OpenOffice Quickstart, > > > > > No other open applications. > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > Gene... > > > > > On Sep 24, 10:50 am, "Glenn Wilson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > If you wouldn't mind, would you post your system specs? > > Specifically, > > > > > > * CPU > > > > > * RAM > > > > > * OS Version > > > > > * Flash Version > > > > > * Chrome/Chromium Version > > > > > * What other applications or plug-ins you might have running > > > > > > This will certainly help us reproduce and fix this. Thanks! > > > > > > Glenn > > > > > > On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 7:32 AM, Kirk M <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > I have seen this as well and not only having the Flash plugin crash > > but > > > > > > the entire browser as well. I tested this with Flash versions > > 9.0.124, > > > > > > 10 beta (8/18/08) and 10 beta (9/15/08). Behavior is basically the > > same > > > > > > using all 3 versions. This behavior did not improve with Dev > > version > > > > > > 0.2.152.1 either. I keep SysInternals' Process Explorer running in > > the > > > > > > Tray and can always tell when Flash is causing trouble when the > > (single > > > > > > core) CPU shoots to 100%. The browser becomes unresponsive (as does > > the > > > > > > entire OS at times) however, the misbehaving website/plugin dialog > > box > > > > > > for the Flash plugin only comes up once in awhile in these cases > > and > > > > > > that usually takes a couple of minutes to happen (long time to wait > > > > when > > > > > > one is cooking their CPU). > > > > > > > The Flash plugin for Chrome I believe is the same one that Firefox > > and > > > > > > Opera make use of and is admittedly known for it's poor quality as > > > > > > compared to the version for IE. Because of this, Opera and Firefox > > has > > > > > > always had significantly worse performance with Flash based media > > than > > > > > > IE. Obviously Chrome suffers from the same thing but much worse. > > > > > > > On 9/24/2008 12:54 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > > > > > ... inside Chrome 0.2.149.30 > > > > > > > have others seen this? --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Chromium-discuss" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/chromium-discuss?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
