Hi Gene, Kirk & Daniel, We have a potential fix for this issue in a recent build. If you would, please try it out:
http://build.chromium.org/buildbot/snapshots/chromium-rel-xp/2744/chrome-win32.zip No need to uninstall Chrome, just download and unzip this file and run "chrome.exe" inside the extracted folder. Please give this a try and let us know if this improves the issues you're seeing. Thanks for the report! Glenn On Fri, Oct 3, 2008 at 6:14 AM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I have the exact same issues as explained by Kirk M. > > Here are my specs: > > Pentium 4 CPU 2.4Ghz > > 1.49 GB Ram > > Windows XP Service Pack 3 Build 2600 > > Chrome Official Build 2200 > Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US) AppleWebKit/525.13 > (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/0.2.149.30 Safari/525.13 > > Other apps: Google updater, AVG updater, OpenOffice Quickstart, > > No other open applications. > > Thanks, > > Gene... > > > On Sep 24, 10:50 am, "Glenn Wilson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > If you wouldn't mind, would you post your system specs? Specifically, > > > > * CPU > > * RAM > > * OS Version > > * Flash Version > > * Chrome/Chromium Version > > * What other applications or plug-ins you might have running > > > > This will certainly help us reproduce and fix this. Thanks! > > > > Glenn > > > > On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 7:32 AM, Kirk M <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > I have seen this as well and not only having the Flash plugin crash but > > > the entire browser as well. I tested this with Flash versions 9.0.124, > > > 10 beta (8/18/08) and 10 beta (9/15/08). Behavior is basically the same > > > using all 3 versions. This behavior did not improve with Dev version > > > 0.2.152.1 either. I keep SysInternals' Process Explorer running in the > > > Tray and can always tell when Flash is causing trouble when the (single > > > core) CPU shoots to 100%. The browser becomes unresponsive (as does the > > > entire OS at times) however, the misbehaving website/plugin dialog box > > > for the Flash plugin only comes up once in awhile in these cases and > > > that usually takes a couple of minutes to happen (long time to wait > when > > > one is cooking their CPU). > > > > > The Flash plugin for Chrome I believe is the same one that Firefox and > > > Opera make use of and is admittedly known for it's poor quality as > > > compared to the version for IE. Because of this, Opera and Firefox has > > > always had significantly worse performance with Flash based media than > > > IE. Obviously Chrome suffers from the same thing but much worse. > > > > > On 9/24/2008 12:54 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > > ... inside Chrome 0.2.149.30 > > > > have others seen this? > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Chromium-discuss" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/chromium-discuss?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
