Hmm, I can see a possible compromise in this area.
Here's how I see it working...

Initially, Ctrl+F opens the find dialog.

additionally, if the find dialog is open, but not in focus, then Ctrl+F
would switch focus to the find dialog.

And, if the find dialog is open and in focus, hitting Ctrl+F or Esc (both
should be implemented) would close the find dialog.


This is almost exactly how it is implemented in the stable version. The only
change is that Ctrl+F behaves like the Esc key in the case where the dialog
is open and in focus. This way you would only have to hit Ctrl+F once to get
focus back to the dialog (which is how it works now), and you would still
get the toggle effect. Notice, as the find dialog works now, you would have
to give focus back to the dialog box by hitting Ctrl+F before hitting the
Esc key to close it. You are currently not able to use a single keyboard
shortcut to close the find dialog when it is not already in focus.

Does this sound like a reasonable solution?

On Fri, Jan 30, 2009 at 4:33 PM, S D Allen <[email protected]>wrote:

> Well  FWIW since most of your users are probably coming from Firefox as I,
> they're used to the toggle. You've got to be consistent across the entire
> interface and do what USERS expect.
>
> On Fri, Jan 30, 2009 at 4:03 PM, Erek Speed <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>>
>> I think <Esc> is probably intuitive for closing a dialog box, perhaps
>> more so then toggling.  I think the issue brought up by Finnur is much
>> more relevant.  Having to hit ctrl-f twice for focus would be
>> annoying.
>>
>> On Jan 30, 3:51 pm, S D Allen <[email protected]> wrote:
>> > That's not the point -- It should toggle as that's intuitive and good
>> User
>> > Interface development.
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Cheers,
> Steve
> http://www.linkedin.com/in/torontostephenallen
>
>
> >
>


-- 
Rahul

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
Chromium Discussion mailing list: [email protected] 
View archives, change email options, or unsubscribe: 
    http://groups.google.com/group/chromium-discuss
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to