Thanks. Please consider my support for network interception voiced then. There doesn't seem to be anything on the wishlist about preferences, and I think the network interception would be more useful anyway - content blockers etc could use it.
Also, that wish list seems to cover some APIs which have been (partially?) implemented - eg Cross-origin XHR. On May 5, 2:11 pm, Aaron Boodman <[email protected]> wrote: > User-agent switching could fit under network interception or under > preferences. Things in "wish list" generally mean there's nobody > working actively on them, so it's unclear when they might be done. But > voicing support for certain APIs definitely helps us prioritize. > > - a > > > > On Mon, May 4, 2009 at 9:39 PM, NickLothian <[email protected]> wrote: > > > I've been looking a bit at the extension system, too. I was thinking > > of building a user-agent changer, but there doesn't seem to be an API > > to do that (yet?) > > > Onhttp://dev.chromium.org/developers/design-documents/extensions/apiwis... > > there are "Network" and "Navigation Interception" sections, and I the > > API would probably fit under one of those. > > > Is it reasonable to assume the stuff on that list will be implemented > > at some stage? I'm assuming there isn't much point raising a bug > > saying "I'm impatient"? > > > Nick > > > On May 4, 8:27 am, Aaron Boodman <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Hi Andrew, > > >> You win the prize for first developer (that I'm aware of) outside of > >> Google to spot and build something with the new extension stuff we've > >> been working on :). I installed your extension and it seems to work > >> fine, other than some known glitchiness in the rendering, for which I > >> have fixes pending. > > >> I took a look at your code, and it seems like one point that was hard > >> was getting the URL of the current page. We're working on APIs right > >> now to make this easy to get without using content scripts. > > >> Anyway, I think we're too the point where bugs on the extensions > >> system is starting to make sense, so file away. You can cc me directly > >> to avoid some latency. > > >> Thanks, > > >> - a > > >> On Sun, May 3, 2009 at 2:41 PM, Andrew Charlton <[email protected]> > >> wrote: > > >> > Hi folks, > > >> > I've been following the extension system as it evolves (The howto and > >> > new samples > >> > athttp://dev.chromium.org/developers/design-documents/extensions/howto > >> > are really cool, thanks to whoever is keeping that up to date). I've > >> > been playing around with creating my own extension, and I've run into > >> > a couple of issues that look like bugs. Is it appropriate at this > >> > stage to file bugs on the extension system, or is it better to wait > >> > until the system is feature-complete? > > >> > By the way, the extension I'm working on is a Google Bookmarks syncing > >> > tool - you can check it out > >> > athttp://sites.google.com/site/uniformedopinion/ > > >> > Thanks, > >> > Andrew Charlton --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ Chromium Discussion mailing list: [email protected] View archives, change email options, or unsubscribe: http://groups.google.com/group/chromium-discuss -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
