Thanks for this - I did not know about Article 275 of the Treaty of 
Versailles : incredible ! Now one can understand why it did not get 
sufficient support in the US Senate - it was all due to underground pressure 
on the part of the Californian vine-growers...

I have before me the magnificent cover of FH 140. Churchill is having a 
brandy, judging from the shape of the glass, but apart from the baby with 
his bottle and the boy with a beer (?) they all seem to be raising  a 
"coupe" to the health of the happy octagenerian. Thanks to the List for 
teaching me that the standard "coupe" was shaped after Marie-Antoinette's 
breasts (obviously an apocryphal story - but seductive regardless). There is 
no bottle to be seen. What is in the "coupes"? Yugoslav fizz ? (Most common 
in British "off-licences" in the 1950s - at the time, grocery shops and the 
few early "supermarkets" were not allowed to sell "intoxicating liquor".) I 
am surprised that Low should not have placed a magnum (at least) of Pol 
Roger in a prominent position.

By the way, who is the lady on the wall picture on the back cover? It is 
obviously Marlborough on the front cover - but who is she ?

Best wishes to all,

Antoine Capet, Rouen (France)
==========
----- Original Message ----- 
From: Anthony Calabrese
To: List Churchill
Sent: Friday, December 19, 2008 6:53 PM
Subject: [ChurchillChat] Re: WSC & champagne


The French have been very protective of the word "champagne."  The Treaty of 
Versailles contains the following:

Article 275
Germany undertakes on condition that reciprocity is accorded in these 
matters to respect any law, or any administrative or judicial decision given 
in conformity with such law, in force in any Allied or Associated State and 
duly communicated to her by the proper authorities, defining or regulating 
the right to any regional appellation in respect of wine or spirits produced 
in the State to which the region belongs, or the conditions under which the 
use of any such appellation may be permitted; and the importation, 
exportation, manufacture, distribution, sale or offering for sale of 
products or articles bearing regional appellations inconsistent with such 
law or order shall be prohibited by the German Government and repressed by 
the measures prescribed in the preceding Article.


This has been interpreted to mean that ratifying power to the treaty could 
not allow winemakers to use the term "champagne."  Some winemakers (such as 
Spain) were not parties to the treaty.  I believe there also was a question 
of whether Australia itself ratified the treaty, or whether Britain ratified 
it on behalf of the British Empire.  The US did not ratify the treaty (the 
right result, though for the wrong reasons) so this clause did not apply to 
us.

The EU later clarified that the "champagne" designation only could apply to 
wine from Champagne.

In teh US, many wineries used the term "champagne" as a generic term.  The 
French were not happy about that.  Today, basically this is no longer iused, 
for two reasons:

1.  US winemakers themselves stopped using the term themselves.  The US wine 
industry has matured and now produces wines that often are better than 
France.  So there is no longer a need to try and enbvoke the mystery of 
French wine (and to the fact that many French champagne houses have moved 
into California).  Also, with the maturity of the California industry, 
"Napa" and "California" have become generic names for certain styles of 
wines in India and China.  So American wine producers have a common cause 
with their French brethren.

2.  UNder US consumer protection law, you can no longer use the term 
"champagne" unless you used it before 2006.

So how does this tie back to Churchill?  On Election Night I was drinking 
champagne.  My wife asked why, considering that I was a rather strong McCain 
partisan.  I replied by paraphrasing Churchill -- "Champagne -- in defeat I 
need it".





Send e-mail faster without improving your typing skills. Get your HotmailĀ® 
account.


--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"ChurchillChat" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/ChurchillChat?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to