On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 9:24 PM, Jonathan Sandys < [email protected]> wrote:
[snip] The editor of the Telegraph has a responsibility to retract this > "Editorial" and rewrite it with facts, not circumstancial evidence and > irresponsible opinion. > > The comment on Randolph I am not even going to comment on. I hope > readers will take this up with the Telegraph. What an insulting and > unessesary article, for God's sake, the man isn't even cold yet! Where > is the compassion? Why is truth so hard to find in the media these > days. Is the Telegraph the new Sun? (For US readers, The Enquirer)? > In my very recent experience on an entirely different matter (ownership of the existing rights to A. Conan Doyle's works and characters), the Telegraph declines to publish retractions when errors in its articles are brought to its attention, and also does not print the corrective letters to the editor that it suggests itself injured parties write as an alternative to the retractions it refuses to provide. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "ChurchillChat" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/churchillchat?hl=en.
