The Illuminati, specifically David Rockefeller, do not want to extract much oil because if they did, the price would lower. If memory serves, I read that here on this list, so what you're saying tents444 is invalid.
Peace, Arlene Johnson Publisher/Author http://www.truedemocracy.net -----Original Message----- >From: tents444 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Sent: Aug 23, 2006 4:20 AM >To: cia-drugs@yahoogroups.com >Subject: [cia-drugs] Re: ruppert to leave the USA for good > > >It doesn't really matter that much if oil is biotic or abiotic in >the end. Or even if there is a lot of abiotic oil. What matters is >the cost of extraction. It is simple supply and demand. So the Peak >Oil theory still holds true. Mike Ruppert doesn't own the Peak Oil >theory by the way. He is just one of many people who believe it >still holds true. It is not really a belief in Peak Oil. It is more >a belief that costs are determined largely by supply and demand. >Abiotic oil is not coming in cheap enough and fast enough to >counteract the huge increasing demand for oil. So the cost of oil >keeps going up. > > >--- In cia-drugs@yahoogroups.com, Arlene Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> Anyone who believes that there isn't enough abiotic oil in Russia, >needs to read the 19th edtion. It's free on my Web site for everyone >in this listserv. That's because all my editions are free to the >people who belong to this listserv. The 19th doesn't even need a >password to access. >> >> Peace, >> >> Arlene Johnsom >> Publisher/Author >> http://www.truedemocracy.net >> Click on the 4th icon, the one that says Magazine to access my e- >zine and then scroll down till you see #19. >> >> -----Original Message----- >> >From: tents444 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> >Sent: Aug 22, 2006 2:38 AM >> >To: cia-drugs@yahoogroups.com >> >Subject: [cia-drugs] Re: ruppert to leave the USA for good >> > >> >Bob, I never paid much attention to the vreeland stuff. I ignore >> >most conspiracy theory stuff because I know it would take all my >> >time to thoroughly investigate it and come to a reasonable >> >conclusion. I doubt many people have spent enough time either. >> > >> >So most of us take it all with a grain of salt. So when you list >> >this and that concerning a multitude of issues and try to string >> >them together into some conclusion, then I pretty much ignore it. >> >Because investigating just one part of your theories would take a >> >very long time. So because of the multitude of "facts" you string >> >together, for that alone I don't believe you are an expert, or >that >> >your conclusions are necessarily true. You are just one more >person >> >with an opinion. >> > >> >But you didn't address my point about abiotic oil and that Peak >Oil >> >theory still remains true even with the existence of abiotic (not >> >from biological sources) oil. >> > >> >As far as I know no one has found a way to pull up enough deep >> >abiotic oil at a reasonable price to make a real dent in the huge >> >demand for oil. So Peak Oil pricing is happening now. >> > >> >It just costs too much to pull up oil from deep levels. And it >isn't >> >refilling oil reservoirs fast enough to make a real dent in the >huge >> >demand for oil. >> > >> >And everyone needs to read part 2 of Mike Ruppert's article from >> >Venezuela describing the incredible harassment he has endured: >> >http://groups.yahoo.com/group/cia-drugs/message/36033 >> > >> >The full Mike Ruppert article from Venezuela is here: >> >>http://www.fromthewilderness.com/free/ww3/081606_burning_bridge.shtm >l >> > >> >The Rense.com page has only the first part of the article: >> >http://www.rense.com/general73/ces.htm >> > >> >eco >> > >> > >> > >> >--- In cia-drugs@yahoogroups.com, "muckblit" <muckblit@> wrote: >> >> >> >> "As for all the personal infighting >> >> crap in the replies here, I wouldn't know" >> >> ...that it's "crap", because it's all citations >> >> from publicly known Ruppert history, >> >> from his own mouth and writings. But >> >> you kill the messenger, ignore specifics. >> >> Unsurprisingly you add that you are wrong >> >> on many other topics as well, failing to >> >> cite specifics on any of those knee-jerk >> >> subliminally cloned positions. >> >> >> >> -Bob >> >> >> >> --- In cia-drugs@yahoogroups.com, "tents444" <tents444@> wrote: >> >> > >> >> > --- In cia-drugs@yahoogroups.com, "mark urban" mcurb@ wrote: >> >> > > >> >> > > Mike wrote a piece that is on the rense.com website about >> >bidding >> >> > > farewell to america. >> >> > >> >> > That is a great article. Here is the URL: >> >> > http://www.rense.com/general73/ces.htm >> >> > >> >> > I agree with nearly all of it. As for all the personal >infighting >> >> > crap in the replies here, I wouldn't know about that stuff, >> >since I >> >> > don't know Mike Ruppert personally. >> >> > >> >> > I hope his website stays up: >> >> > http://www.fromthewilderness.com >> >> > >> >> > It has a lot of good info. >> >> > >> >> > I agree with the peak oil theory. It is already happening. And >> >> > abiotic oil is too deep and too inaccessible right now to >make >> >much >> >> > difference. Even when some abiotic oil bubbles up to become >> >> > accessible it is not doing so in a great enough way to offset >the >> >> > huge demand for oil. So the peak oil theory still holds true. >> >Peak >> >> > Oil is nothing more than the truth of supply and demand >setting >> >> > prices. And abiotic oil deep in the earth costs too much to >> >bring up >> >> > right now. >> >> > >> >> > I disagree that the USA facilitated 9-11. But that is only an >> >> > opinion. I think it is more likely that the hijackers picked >the >> >day >> >> > of the simulated hijackings to pull off the real thing. >> >Brilliant on >> >> > their part. This caused the delay of intercepting aircraft >since >> >> > they thought there was a simulated hijacking going on. >> >> > >> >> > Same as the terrorist attacks in London. The bombers picked >the >> >day >> >> > of a simulated terrorist attack scenario that the authorities >> >were >> >> > doing that day. >> >> > >> >> > So the USA and Britain facilitated the terrorist attacks due >to >> >> > their stupidity. We can all agree on their stupidity can't >we? :) >> >> > >> >> > My favorite paragraph from Mike Ruppert's article: >> >> > >> >> > QUOTE: >> >> > >> >> > My permanent exodus from the US was actually ordained thirty >> >years -- >> >> > to the month -- before I left for good on July 18th, 2006. It >was >> >> > thirty years ago that my then-fiance, a career contract agent >> >for the >> >> > CIA, disclosed to me that "her people" were interested in >giving >> >a >> >> > major boost to my career with LAPD if I would become involved >> >with >> >> > her "anti-terror" operations that involved "overlooking" (i.e. >> >> > protecting) large drug shipments coming in while facilitating >the >> >> > movement of large quantities of firearms going out. I refused >to >> >> > compromise my ethics as a police officer and -- as I wrote on >> >page 6 >> >> > of Crossing the Rubicon - "that has determined the course of >my >> >life >> >> > ever since." >> >> > >> >> > UNQUOTE. >> >> > >> >> >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> >Complete archives at http://www.sitbot.net/ >> > >> >Please let us stay on topic and be civil. >> > >> >OM >> > >> >Yahoo! Groups Links >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > > > > > > >Complete archives at http://www.sitbot.net/ > >Please let us stay on topic and be civil. > >OM > >Yahoo! Groups Links > > > > > > > Complete archives at http://www.sitbot.net/ Please let us stay on topic and be civil. OM Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/cia-drugs/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
