Ian Collins wrote: > On Tue 02/12/08 07:38 , Bill Shannon [EMAIL PROTECTED] sent: >> Ian Collins wrote: >>> Bill Shannon wrote: > >>> From a user's point of view, what's the difference between share-level >>> access that doesn't require a password and anonymous access? >>> >>> The latter does not require a login? >> Well, then that must be what I'm using, because I'm never required to >> login. > > I think that was the point I made to you earlier; once windows has connected > to a share as a user without a password, it will always reconnect without > asking. > > So all that's required is the creation of a "guest" user with no password on > the server.
Is this effectively what Samba is doing when you tell it to allow guest access? How do I create a guest user with no password who has no rights (e.g., to login, ftp, etc.) other than access using cifs? I guess there should be a zfs/cifs management GUI that hides all these implementation details... :-) _______________________________________________ cifs-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/cifs-discuss
