I'm new to Opensolaris, having switched over my home NAS from FreeBSD to 
Opensolaris about 6 months ago because of ZFS and the stability of Opensolaris. 
As such, I'm not familiar with how Opensolaris development works, but find it 
incredible that a fix for such a bug is not released as a patch to the current 
stable release (2009.06), but instead users are asked to upgrade to a 
development release.

I tried upgrading to b118, which was supposed to have the fix. However, b118 
did not even boot, and being new to Opensolaris, I was forced to format and 
reinstall 2009.06. Now I'm disinclined to upgrade to b124 (which supposedly has 
the CIFS fix) and will instead reboot my system on a daily basis when smb 
server hangs.

Maybe the fix will be included in 2010.02? But I just feel that's not the way 
to deal with a bug like this - I cannot wait until February 2010 to have a 
stable system.

Any comments/feedback on why Opensolaris development works this way is 
appreciated.

Thank you.
-- 
This message posted from opensolaris.org
_______________________________________________
cifs-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/cifs-discuss

Reply via email to