cifs-protocol  

Messages by Date

• 2012/03/01 [cifs-protocol] [REG:112030174895568] clarification of MaxMpx value in MS-CIFS Bryan Burgin
• 2012/03/01 Re: [cifs-protocol] [MS-CIFS] PendingRequestTable issues. Christopher R. Hertel
• 2012/03/01 Re: [cifs-protocol] clarification of MaxMpx value in MS-CIFS Josh Curry
• 2012/03/01 Re: [cifs-protocol] clarification of MaxMpx value in MS-CIFS Christopher R. Hertel
• 2012/03/01 [cifs-protocol] [MS-CIFS] PendingRequestTable issues. Christopher R. Hertel
• 2012/03/01 [cifs-protocol] clarification of MaxMpx value in MS-CIFS Jeff Layton
• 2012/02/22 Re: [cifs-protocol] Incomplete information in [MS-PCCRC: 3.1, 3.2] Josh Curry
• 2012/02/22 [cifs-protocol] Incomplete information in [MS-PCCRC: 3.1, 3.2] Christopher R. Hertel
• 2012/02/18 Re: [cifs-protocol] encryption key for NetrLogonSamLogonEx Matthieu Patou
• 2012/02/17 Re: [cifs-protocol] encryption key for NetrLogonSamLogonEx Andrew Bartlett
• 2012/02/15 Re: [cifs-protocol] [REG:112021212002899] encryption key for NetrLogonSamLogonEx Obaid Farooqi
• 2012/02/15 Re: [cifs-protocol] [REG:112021212002899] encryption key for NetrLogonSamLogonEx Obaid Farooqi
• 2012/02/13 Re: [cifs-protocol] encryption key for NetrLogonSamLogonEx Edgar Olougouna
• 2012/02/12 Re: [cifs-protocol] [REG:111101553031054] SystemLibraryDTC Andrew Bartlett
• 2012/02/12 Re: [cifs-protocol] [REG:111101553031054] SystemLibraryDTC Bryan Burgin
• 2012/02/11 [cifs-protocol] ntproof field Matthieu Patou
• 2012/02/11 Re: [cifs-protocol] encryption key for NetrLogonSamLogonEx Sebastian Canevari
• 2012/02/11 [cifs-protocol] encryption key for NetrLogonSamLogonEx Matthieu Patou
• 2012/02/07 Re: [cifs-protocol] [REG:111101553031054] SystemLibraryDTC Bryan Burgin
• 2012/02/02 Re: [cifs-protocol] Confirm kerberos key selection rules for PAC KDC signature Andrew Bartlett
• 2012/02/02 Re: [cifs-protocol] [REG:111101553031054] SystemLibraryDTC Andrew Bartlett
• 2012/01/30 Re: [cifs-protocol] [REG:111101553031054] SystemLibraryDTC Bryan Burgin
• 2012/01/30 Re: [cifs-protocol] Confirm kerberos key selection rules for PAC KDC signature Edgar Olougouna
• 2012/01/29 Re: [cifs-protocol] Confirm kerberos key selection rules for PAC KDC signature Andrew Bartlett
• 2012/01/27 Re: [cifs-protocol] [REG:111101553031054] SystemLibraryDTC Andrew Bartlett
• 2012/01/27 Re: [cifs-protocol] Confirm kerberos key selection rules for PAC KDC signature Edgar Olougouna
• 2012/01/27 Re: [cifs-protocol] [REG:111101553031054] SystemLibraryDTC Bryan Burgin
• 2012/01/26 Re: [cifs-protocol] Confirm kerberos key selection rules for PAC KDC signature Andrew Bartlett
• 2012/01/26 Re: [cifs-protocol] Confirm kerberos key selection rules for PAC KDC signature Edgar Olougouna
• 2012/01/25 Re: [cifs-protocol] [REG:111122854095339] Note regarding SMB_COM_NEGOTIATE Bryan Burgin
• 2012/01/05 Re: [cifs-protocol] Connection turn down problem in W2k8R2? Obaid Farooqi
• 2012/01/05 [cifs-protocol] Connection turn down problem in W2k8R2? Volker Lendecke
• 2012/01/04 Re: [cifs-protocol] [REG:111101553031054] SystemLibraryDTC Bryan Burgin
• 2011/12/28 Re: [cifs-protocol] [REG:111122854095339] Note regarding SMB_COM_NEGOTIATE Bryan Burgin
• 2011/12/28 Re: [cifs-protocol] [REG:111122854095339] Note regarding SMB_COM_NEGOTIATE Christopher R. Hertel
• 2011/12/28 [cifs-protocol] [REG:111122854095339] Note regarding SMB_COM_NEGOTIATE Bryan Burgin
• 2011/12/27 [cifs-protocol] Note regarding SMB_COM_NEGOTIATE Christopher R. Hertel
• 2011/12/24 Re: [cifs-protocol] [REG:111120724281237] SMB2 ProcessId header field for SYNC messages. Obaid Farooqi
• 2011/12/23 Re: [cifs-protocol] [REG:111120724281237] SMB2 ProcessId header field for SYNC messages. Christopher R. Hertel
• 2011/12/23 Re: [cifs-protocol] [REG:111120724281237] SMB2 ProcessId header field for SYNC messages. Obaid Farooqi
• 2011/12/22 [cifs-protocol] [REG:111122055068137] Confirm kerberos key selection rules for PAC KDC signature Bryan Burgin
• 2011/12/19 Re: [cifs-protocol] Confirm kerberos key selection rules for PAC KDC signature Josh Curry
• 2011/12/19 [cifs-protocol] Confirm kerberos key selection rules for PAC KDC signature Andrew Bartlett
• 2011/12/14 Re: [cifs-protocol] [REG:111121459051600] Puzzled: Heimdal upgrade breaks Win2k8 dcpromo Bryan Burgin
• 2011/12/14 [cifs-protocol] [REG:111121459051600] Puzzled: Heimdal upgrade breaks Win2k8 dcpromo Bryan Burgin
• 2011/12/14 [cifs-protocol] [REG: 111121459051600] Puzzled: Heimdal upgrade breaks Win2k8 dcpromo Edgar Olougouna
• 2011/12/13 [cifs-protocol] Puzzled: Heimdal upgrade breaks Win2k8 dcpromo Andrew Bartlett
• 2011/12/12 Re: [cifs-protocol] [REG:111120724281237] SMB2 ProcessId header field for SYNC messages. Obaid Farooqi
• 2011/12/12 Re: [cifs-protocol] [REG:111120724281237] SMB2 ProcessId header field for SYNC messages. Christopher R. Hertel
• 2011/12/09 Re: [cifs-protocol] [REG:111120724281237] SMB2 ProcessId header field for SYNC messages. Obaid Farooqi
• 2011/12/09 Re: [cifs-protocol] [REG:111112257588419] RE: - Windows DC returning WERR_DS_DRA_NO_REPLICA when Samba DC wants to send replica Obaid Farooqi
• 2011/12/08 Re: [cifs-protocol] [REG:111112257588419] - Windows DC returning WERR_DS_DRA_NO_REPLICA when Samba DC wants to send replica Matthieu Patou
• 2011/12/08 [cifs-protocol] Maximum number of file handles allowed for a CIFS/SMB session Rahul Katariya
• 2011/12/06 [cifs-protocol] [REG:111120724281237] SMB2 ProcessId header field for SYNC messages. Bryan Burgin
• 2011/12/06 Re: [cifs-protocol] SMB2 ProcessId header field for SYNC messages. Bryan Burgin
• 2011/12/06 [cifs-protocol] SMB2 ProcessId header field for SYNC messages. Christopher R. Hertel
• 2011/12/02 Re: [cifs-protocol] [REG: 111111580301298 ] DNS partition creation Matthieu Patou
• 2011/12/02 [cifs-protocol] Download performance on CIFS Josu Lazkano
• 2011/11/29 [cifs-protocol] [REG:111111804605994] RE: data checksum value in FRS Hongwei Sun
• 2011/11/29 Re: [cifs-protocol] [REG:111110168569640] RE: double send of command joined from a upstream windows Server Hongwei Sun
• 2011/11/29 Re: [cifs-protocol] [REG:111110168569640] RE: double send of command joined from a upstream windows Server Matthieu Patou
• 2011/11/28 Re: [cifs-protocol] [REG:111110168569640] RE: double send of command joined from a upstream windows Server Hongwei Sun
• 2011/11/22 Re: [cifs-protocol] [REG: 111111580301298 ] DNS partition creation Matthieu Patou
• 2011/11/22 Re: [cifs-protocol] [REG:111072877629207] - Windows DC returning WERR_DS_DRA_NO_REPLICA when Samba DC wants to send replica Matthieu Patou
• 2011/11/21 Re: [cifs-protocol] [REG:111110168569640] RE: double send of command joined from a upstream windows Server Hongwei Sun
• 2011/11/17 Re: [cifs-protocol] data checksum value in FRS Sebastian Canevari
• 2011/11/15 [cifs-protocol] [REG: 111111580301298 ] DNS partition creation Tarun Chopra
• 2011/11/15 [cifs-protocol] [REG: 111111582582159] highest_usn and tmp_highest_usn in highwatermark < max usn sent in getcchanges Edgar Olougouna
• 2011/11/15 Re: [cifs-protocol] highest_usn and tmp_highest_usn in highwatermark < max usn sent in getcchanges Sebastian Canevari
• 2011/11/15 [cifs-protocol] highest_usn and tmp_highest_usn in highwatermark < max usn sent in getcchanges Matthieu Patou
• 2011/11/15 Re: [cifs-protocol] DNS partition creation Sebastian Canevari
• 2011/11/15 Re: [cifs-protocol] [REG:111080976529107] RE: Behavior explanation on subtree delete control behavior with iscriticalsystemobject Hongwei Sun
• 2011/11/15 [cifs-protocol] DNS partition creation Matthieu Patou
• 2011/11/15 Re: [cifs-protocol] [REG:111080976529107] RE: Behavior explanation on subtree delete control behavior with iscriticalsystemobject Matthieu Patou
• 2011/11/14 Re: [cifs-protocol] [REG:111101553031054] RE: SystemLibraryDTC Andrew Bartlett
• 2011/11/14 Re: [cifs-protocol] [REG:111101553031054] RE: SystemLibraryDTC Hongwei Sun
• 2011/11/14 Re: [cifs-protocol] [REG:111080976529107] RE: Behavior explanation on subtree delete control behavior with iscriticalsystemobject Matthieu Patou
• 2011/11/07 Re: [cifs-protocol] [REG:111092948476937] FRSRPC: questions about schedule Matthieu Patou
• 2011/11/04 Re: [cifs-protocol] [REG:111091961780016] Re: - About stage_header data Obaid Farooqi
• 2011/10/28 Re: [cifs-protocol] [REG:111092854890403] RE: double send of command joined from a upstream windows Server Hongwei Sun
• 2011/10/28 Re: [cifs-protocol] [REG:111092854890403] RE: double send of command joined from a upstream windows Server Matthieu Patou
• 2011/10/26 Re: [cifs-protocol] [REG:111092973873305] [Pfif] Maximum Simultaneous Request for CIFS behavior clarification Tarun Chopra
• 2011/10/25 Re: [cifs-protocol] [REG:111092948476937] FRSRPC: questions about schedule Obaid Farooqi
• 2011/10/21 Re: [cifs-protocol] [REG:111101553031054] RE: SystemLibraryDTC Andrew Bartlett
• 2011/10/21 Re: [cifs-protocol] [REG:111101553031054] RE: SystemLibraryDTC Hongwei Sun
• 2011/10/21 Re: [cifs-protocol] [REG: 111101256623456] SMB2: ioctl max size Edgar Olougouna
• 2011/10/21 Re: [cifs-protocol] [REG:111092854890403] RE: double send of command joined from a upstream windows Server Hongwei Sun
• 2011/10/21 Re: [cifs-protocol] Precisions for FRSRPC Matthieu Patou
• 2011/10/21 Re: [cifs-protocol] [REG:111092948476937] FRSRPC: questions about schedule Matthieu Patou
• 2011/10/20 Re: [cifs-protocol] [REG:111092948476937] FRSRPC: questions about schedule Obaid Farooqi
• 2011/10/20 Re: [cifs-protocol] [REG:111101553031054] RE: SystemLibraryDTC Hongwei Sun
• 2011/10/19 Re: [cifs-protocol] [REG:111092854890403] RE: double send of command joined from a upstream windows Server Matthieu Patou
• 2011/10/19 Re: [cifs-protocol] [REG:111092854890403] RE: double send of command joined from a upstream windows Server Hongwei Sun
• 2011/10/18 [cifs-protocol] AUTO: Dan Argent is out of the office (returning 24/10/2011) Dan Argent
• 2011/10/18 Re: [cifs-protocol] [REG:111091961780016] Re: - About stage_header data Obaid Farooqi
• 2011/10/18 Re: [cifs-protocol] [REG:111091961780016] Re: - About stage_header data Obaid Farooqi
• 2011/10/18 Re: [cifs-protocol] [REG:111091961780016] Re: - About stage_header data Matthieu Patou
• 2011/10/18 Re: [cifs-protocol] [REG:111101553031054] RE: SystemLibraryDTC Andrew Bartlett
• 2011/10/18 [cifs-protocol] [REG:111101553031054] RE: SystemLibraryDTC Hongwei Sun
• 2011/10/17 Re: [cifs-protocol] [REG:111091961780016] Re: - About stage_header data Obaid Farooqi
• 2011/10/17 Re: [cifs-protocol] [REG: 111101553031054] SystemLibraryDTC Hongwei Sun
• 2011/10/17 Re: [cifs-protocol] Two new MS-FRS1 issues from Matthieu Patou re "Locking" Edgar Olougouna
• 2011/10/15 [cifs-protocol] [REG: 111101553031054] SystemLibraryDTC Edgar Olougouna
• 2011/10/14 [cifs-protocol] SystemLibraryDTC Andrew Bartlett
• 2011/10/14 Re: [cifs-protocol] [REG:111092973873305] [Pfif] Maximum Simultaneous Request for CIFS behavior clarification Bryan Burgin
• 2011/10/14 Re: [cifs-protocol] [REG: 111101256623456] SMB2: ioctl max size Edgar Olougouna
• 2011/10/13 Re: [cifs-protocol] [REG:111092854890403] RE: double send of command joined from a upstream windows Server Hongwei Sun
• 2011/10/13 Re: [cifs-protocol] Two new MS-FRS1 issues from Matthieu Patou re "Locking" Edgar Olougouna
• 2011/10/13 Re: [cifs-protocol] [REG:111091961780016] Re: - About stage_header data Obaid Farooqi
• 2011/10/13 Re: [cifs-protocol] Two new MS-FRS1 issues from Matthieu Patou re "Locking" Matthieu Patou
• 2011/10/12 Re: [cifs-protocol] Two new MS-FRS1 issues from Matthieu Patou re "Locking" Edgar Olougouna
• 2011/10/12 [cifs-protocol] [REG: 111101256623456] SMB2: ioctl max size Edgar Olougouna
• 2011/10/12 [cifs-protocol] SMB2: ioctl max size Stefan (metze) Metzmacher
• 2011/10/11 [cifs-protocol] [REG:111092854890403] RE: double send of command joined from a upstream windows Server Hongwei Sun
• 2011/10/10 Re: [cifs-protocol] [REG:111091961780016] Re: - About stage_header data Obaid Farooqi
• 2011/10/06 Re: [cifs-protocol] [REG: 111092947767946] Question about MS DNS behavior regarding DNS packets containing multiple questions Edgar Olougouna
• 2011/10/05 Re: [cifs-protocol] [REG:111100564603264] [MS-NBTE] and NetBIOS name case. Bryan Burgin
• 2011/10/05 Re: [cifs-protocol] [REG:11100564603264] [MS-NBTE] and NetBIOS name case. Christopher R. Hertel
• 2011/10/05 [cifs-protocol] [REG:11100564603264] [MS-NBTE] and NetBIOS name case. Bryan Burgin
• 2011/10/05 [cifs-protocol] [MS-NBTE] and NetBIOS name case. Christopher R. Hertel
• 2011/10/05 Re: [cifs-protocol] [REG:111100558993529] deleted object in Sebastian Canevari
• 2011/10/05 Re: [cifs-protocol] [REG:111100558993529] deleted object in Matthieu Patou
• 2011/10/05 [cifs-protocol] [REG:111100558993529] deleted object in Bryan Burgin
• 2011/10/04 Re: [cifs-protocol] [REG:111092051963496] RE: flag 0x80 in the flags attribute of a remote_co part Matthieu Patou
• 2011/10/03 [cifs-protocol] [REG:111092051963496] RE: flag 0x80 in the flags attribute of a remote_co part Hongwei Sun
• 2011/09/30 Re: [cifs-protocol] [REG:111092948476937] FRSRPC: questions about schedule Obaid Farooqi
• 2011/09/29 [cifs-protocol] [REG:111092973873305] [Pfif] Maximum Simultaneous Request for CIFS behavior clarification Bryan Burgin
• 2011/09/29 Re: [cifs-protocol] [Pfif] Maximum Simultaneous Request for CIFS behavior clarification [REG:111092973873305] Tom Jebo
• 2011/09/29 Re: [cifs-protocol] [Pfif] Maximum Simultaneous Request for CIFS behavior clarification Tom Jebo
• 2011/09/29 Re: [cifs-protocol] [Pfif] Maximum Simultaneous Request for CIFS behavior clarification Christopher R. Hertel
• 2011/09/29 Re: [cifs-protocol] Question about MS DNS server dropping packets from client Hongwei Sun
• 2011/09/29 [cifs-protocol] [Pfif] Maximum Simultaneous Request for CIFS behavior clarification Steve French
• 2011/09/29 Re: [cifs-protocol] [Pfif] FRSRPC: questions about schedule Steve French
• 2011/09/29 [cifs-protocol] [REG: 111092947767946] Question about MS DNS behavior regarding DNS packets containing multiple questions Edgar Olougouna
• 2011/09/29 Re: [cifs-protocol] FRSRPC: questions about schedule Tom Jebo
• 2011/09/29 Re: [cifs-protocol] Question about MS DNS behavior regarding DNS packets containing multiple questions Tom Jebo
• 2011/09/29 Re: [cifs-protocol] Question about MS DNS server dropping packets from client Tom Jebo
• 2011/09/29 [cifs-protocol] FRSRPC: questions about schedule Matthieu Patou
• 2011/09/28 [cifs-protocol] Question about MS DNS behavior regarding DNS packets containing multiple questions Kai Blin
• 2011/09/28 Re: [cifs-protocol] [REG:110081057234684] Requesting clarification of MS-DNSP data structure DNS_RPC_NAME Kai Blin
• 2011/09/28 [cifs-protocol] Question about MS DNS server dropping packets from client Kai Blin
• 2011/09/28 Re: [cifs-protocol] [REG:110081057234684] Requesting clarification of MS-DNSP data structure DNS_RPC_NAME Bryan Burgin
• 2011/09/28 Re: [cifs-protocol] [REG:110081057234684] Requesting clarification of MS-DNSP data structure DNS_RPC_NAME Kai Blin
• 2011/09/27 Re: [cifs-protocol] [REG:111091961780016] - About stage_header data Matthieu Patou
• 2011/09/27 Re: [cifs-protocol] [REG:111091961780016] - About stage_header data Obaid Farooqi
• 2011/09/27 Re: [cifs-protocol] Precisions for FRSRPC Edgar Olougouna
• 2011/09/22 Re: [cifs-protocol] [REG:111091520687224] MS-FRS1 precision Matthieu Patou
• 2011/09/22 Re: [cifs-protocol] [REG:111091520687224] MS-FRS1 precision Matthieu Patou
• 2011/09/22 Re: [cifs-protocol] [REG:111091520687224] MS-FRS1 precision Obaid Farooqi
• 2011/09/22 Re: [cifs-protocol] [REG:111091520687224] MS-FRS1 precision Obaid Farooqi
• 2011/09/22 Re: [cifs-protocol] Precisions for FRSRPC Edgar Olougouna
• 2011/09/21 Re: [cifs-protocol] [REG:111082958393266] RE: Precision related to FRS documentation Hongwei Sun
• 2011/09/21 Re: [cifs-protocol] [REG:111091961780016] - About stage_header data Obaid Farooqi
• 2011/09/20 Re: [cifs-protocol] [REG: 111091521929950 ]RE: about multi packet file transfer in FRSRPC Edgar Olougouna
• 2011/09/20 Re: [cifs-protocol] Two new MS-FRS1 issues from Matthieu Patou re "Locking" Edgar Olougouna
• 2011/09/20 Re: [cifs-protocol] Two new MS-FRS1 issues from Matthieu Patou re "Locking" Matthieu Patou
• 2011/09/20 Re: [cifs-protocol] flag 0x80 in the flags attribute of a remote_co part Matthieu Patou
• 2011/09/19 Re: [cifs-protocol] flag 0x80 in the flags attribute of a remote_co part Hongwei Sun
• 2011/09/19 Re: [cifs-protocol] flag 0x80 in the flags attribute of a remote_co part Hongwei Sun
• 2011/09/19 Re: [cifs-protocol] About stage_header data Sebastian Canevari
• 2011/09/18 [cifs-protocol] About stage_header data Matthieu Patou
• 2011/09/18 Re: [cifs-protocol] [REG:111082958393266] RE: Precision related to FRS documentation Matthieu Patou
• 2011/09/15 Re: [cifs-protocol] Errors when doing a DsAddEntry Hongwei Sun
• 2011/09/15 Re: [cifs-protocol] [REG:111081664438980] RE: Level 257 FindFirst rejected by some Windows servers even though NTLM Hongwei Sun
• 2011/09/15 Re: [cifs-protocol] [REG:111082958393266] RE: Precision related to FRS documentation Hongwei Sun
• 2011/09/15 Re: [cifs-protocol] [REG:111091520687224] MS-FRS1 precision Obaid Farooqi
• 2011/09/15 Re: [cifs-protocol] [REG: 111091521929950 ]RE: about multi packet file transfer in FRSRPC Edgar Olougouna
• 2011/09/14 Re: [cifs-protocol] [REG:111080856926389] Nameconflict with "ss" vs. "ß" Stefan (metze) Metzmacher
• 2011/09/14 [cifs-protocol] [REG: 111091521929950 ]RE: about multi packet file transfer in FRSRPC Obaid Farooqi
• 2011/09/14 [cifs-protocol] [REG: 111091520687224 ] RE: MS-FRS1 precision Obaid Farooqi
• 2011/09/14 [cifs-protocol] about multi packet file transfer in FRSRPC Matthieu Patou
• 2011/09/14 [cifs-protocol] MS-FRS1 precision Matthieu Patou
• 2011/09/14 Re: [cifs-protocol] [REG:111080856926389] Nameconflict with "ss" vs. "ß" Obaid Farooqi
• 2011/09/14 Re: [cifs-protocol] Precisions for FRSRPC Edgar Olougouna
• 2011/09/13 Re: [cifs-protocol] Errors when doing a DsAddEntry Hongwei Sun
• 2011/09/13 Re: [cifs-protocol] [REG:111083100373286] FRS clarification about VVJOIN in FRS Obaid Farooqi
• 2011/09/13 Re: [cifs-protocol] Errors when doing a DsAddEntry tridge
• 2011/09/08 Re: [cifs-protocol] Errors when doing a DsAddEntry Hongwei Sun
• 2011/09/08 Re: [cifs-protocol] [REG:111080856926389] Nameconflict with "ss" vs. "ß" Obaid Farooqi
• 2011/09/07 Re: [cifs-protocol] [REG:111082958393266] RE: Precision related to FRS documentation Matthieu Patou
• 2011/09/07 [cifs-protocol] [REG:111082958393266] RE: Precision related to FRS documentation Hongwei Sun
• 2011/09/07 Re: [cifs-protocol] [REG:111081664438980] RE: Level 257 FindFirst rejected by some Windows servers even though NTLM Hongwei Sun
• 2011/09/06 [cifs-protocol] [REG: 111090284142510] Precisions for FRSRPC Edgar Olougouna
• 2011/09/02 Re: [cifs-protocol] Precisions for FRSRPC Josh Curry
• 2011/09/02 [cifs-protocol] Precisions for FRSRPC Matthieu Patou
• 2011/09/01 Re: [cifs-protocol] [REG: 111083054067588] RE: Handling of passwords in LSA CreateTrustedDomainInfoEx2 Andrew Bartlett
• 2011/08/31 Re: [cifs-protocol] Errors when doing a DsAddEntry Andrew Bartlett
• 2011/08/31 Re: [cifs-protocol] [REG:111081664438980] RE: Level 257 FindFirst rejected by some Windows servers even though NTLM Steve French
• 2011/08/31 [cifs-protocol] [REG: 111083054067588] RE: Handling of passwords in LSA CreateTrustedDomainInfoEx2 Hongwei Sun
• 2011/08/31 Re: [cifs-protocol] [REG:111083100373286] FRS clarification about VVJOIN in FRS Obaid Farooqi
• 2011/08/31 Re: [cifs-protocol] Errors when doing a DsAddEntry Hongwei Sun
• 2011/08/31 Re: [cifs-protocol] [REG:111081664438980] RE: Level 257 FindFirst rejected by some Windows servers even though NTLM Hongwei Sun
• 2011/08/31 Re: [cifs-protocol] Errors when doing a DsAddEntry Josh Curry
• 2011/08/30 [cifs-protocol] Errors when doing a DsAddEntry Andrew Bartlett
• 2011/08/30 Re: [cifs-protocol] FRS clarification about VVJOIN in FRS Josh Curry
• 2011/08/30 [cifs-protocol] FRS clarification about VVJOIN in FRS Matthieu Patou
• 2011/08/30 Re: [cifs-protocol] [REG:111081664438980] RE: Level 257 FindFirst rejected by some Windows servers even though NTLM Steve French
• 2011/08/30 Re: [cifs-protocol] [REG:111082117135230] RE: Initial replication of sysvol through FRS Hongwei Sun
• 2011/08/30 Re: [cifs-protocol] [REG:111082117135230] RE: Initial replication of sysvol through FRS Matthieu Patou
• 2011/08/30 Re: [cifs-protocol] [REG:111081664438980] RE: Level 257 FindFirst rejected by some Windows servers even though NTLM Hongwei Sun

• Earlier messages
• Later messages