Andrew,

I will be assisting you with your issue regarding section 3.1.4.7.8.  I wanted 
to clarify what you sent in your link, to ensure I am reading your question 
correctly.  It looks like you removed functionality that sets the return value 
to NT_STATUS_OK (I assume this maps to the enum value 0x00000000 
STATUS_SUCCESS) because the correct response is to return 0x8000001A 
STATUS_NO_MORE_ENTRIES which it looks like you do down in line 1148.  I ask 
just to make sure as I need to get more familiar with your version control 
software and how to read the change logs.  Just for my own education if I click 
the link "source/rpc_server/lsa/dcesrv_lsa.c" on the page you sent, that would 
take me to the latest source , correct?

If this is correct, then to re-state your question, you are looking for the 
processing section in MS-LSAD 3.1.4.7.7 (this applies to 
LsarEnumerateTrustedDomainsEx also) and 3.1.4.7.8 to be updated to include the 
case where "the number of trusted domains equals 0".  You are looking for the 
documentation to show that STATUS_NO_MORE_ENTRIES is the correct return status 
in this case, is that correct?

Richard Guthrie
Open Protocols Support Team
Support Escalation Engineer, US-CSS DSC PROTOCOL TEAM 7100 N Hwy 161, Irving, 
TX - 75039 "Las Colinas - LC2"
Tel: +1 469 775 7794
E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
We're hiring 
http://members.microsoft.com/careers/search/details.aspx?JobID=A976CE32-B0B9-41E3-AF57-05A82B88383E&start=1&interval=10&SortCol=DatePosted

-----Original Message-----
From: Andrew Bartlett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, July 20, 2008 9:10 PM
To: Interoperability Documentation Help
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: LSA trusted domains enumeration (for n=0)

(resending with the correct title)

I'm looking for correction assistance in the form of improved documentation.

MS-LSAD 3.1.4.7.8 shows how to implement an enumeration call.  It does not 
however make it clear which error/success message to include in the
reply, for the '0 trusted domains' case.

See 
http://git.samba.org/?p=samba.git;a=commitdiff;h=40a55b34c2ce75267cf004dc4cfb8153c061e66b;hp=55bde3c9daeafdac04574365c23d181345639f34

I hope this can be clarified in the docs.

Andrew Bartlett
--
Andrew Bartlett
http://samba.org/~abartlet/
Authentication Developer, Samba Team           http://samba.org
Samba Developer, Red Hat Inc.
_______________________________________________
cifs-protocol mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/cifs-protocol

Reply via email to