On Tue, 2008-07-22 at 06:33 -0700, Richard Guthrie wrote: > Andrew, > > I will be assisting you with your issue regarding section 3.1.4.7.8. > I wanted to clarify what you sent in your link, to ensure I am reading > your question correctly. It looks like you removed functionality that > sets the return value to NT_STATUS_OK (I assume this maps to the enum > value 0x00000000 STATUS_SUCCESS) because the correct response is to > return 0x8000001A STATUS_NO_MORE_ENTRIES which it looks like you do > down in line 1148.
Yep. > I ask just to make sure as I need to get more familiar with your > version control software and how to read the change logs. Just for my > own education if I click the link "source/rpc_server/lsa/dcesrv_lsa.c" > on the page you sent, that would take me to the latest source , > correct? Yes. If you click on the links of the form: diff --git a/source/rpc_server/lsa/dcesrv_lsa.c b/source/rpc_server/lsa/dcesrv_lsa.c These get you to the before and after view of this file respectively. > If this is correct, then to re-state your question, you are looking > for the processing section in MS-LSAD 3.1.4.7.7 (this applies to > LsarEnumerateTrustedDomainsEx also) and 3.1.4.7.8 to be updated to > include the case where "the number of trusted domains equals 0". You > are looking for the documentation to show that STATUS_NO_MORE_ENTRIES > is the correct return status in this case, is that correct? That is correct. Andrew Bartlett -- Andrew Bartlett http://samba.org/~abartlet/ Authentication Developer, Samba Team http://samba.org Samba Developer, Red Hat Inc.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ cifs-protocol mailing list [email protected] https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/cifs-protocol
