Andrew, As per your last mail, we agree this looks like a good scenario to target for the upcoming IO lab. As we have discussed, in order to not waste time on debugging setup while you are in the lab, we would need to work together prior to establish the correct repro environment. Establishment of this repro would require your expertise to ensure the environment accurately reproduces this issue.
Let us know if this sounds like an acceptable action plan and we can work out the details on our next call together. Richard Guthrie Open Protocols Support Team Support Escalation Engineer, US-CSS DSC PROTOCOL TEAM 7100 N Hwy 161, Irving, TX - 75039 "Las Colinas - LC2" Tel: +1 469 775 7794 E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] We're hiring http://members.microsoft.com/careers/search/details.aspx?JobID=A976CE32-B0B9-41E3-AF57-05A82B88383E&start=1&interval=10&SortCol=DatePosted -----Original Message----- From: Andrew Bartlett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, August 12, 2008 8:48 PM To: Richard Guthrie Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [cifs-protocol] RE: 600169 - RE: DCE/RPC PFC_SUPPORT_HEADER_SIGN not optional On Mon, 2008-08-11 at 08:41 -0700, Richard Guthrie wrote: > Andrew, > Can you send a capture that exhibits the behavior you describe with > NTLMv2 as well as clarify your comments about behavior you have seen > in the past? Basically I need as much information as you can provide > on the behavior you have experienced to help understand the problem. > This would help to isolate the behavior you are seeing and complete > additional analysis as required. I will do, when I get a chance. We should also work to get Samba4 set up in the interop lab, so you can just run tests against it and see the behaviour live. Andrew Bartlett -- Andrew Bartlett http://samba.org/~abartlet/ Authentication Developer, Samba Team http://samba.org Samba Developer, Red Hat Inc. _______________________________________________ cifs-protocol mailing list [email protected] https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/cifs-protocol
