Andrew,

  I just want to check with you to see if you have any questions regarding the 
request and our response below.  If not,  I will resolve this case for now.

Thanks!

Hongwei 

-----Original Message-----
From: Hongwei Sun 
Sent: Monday, January 18, 2010 6:27 PM
To: 'Andrew Bartlett'
Cc: p...@tridgell.net; cifs-proto...@samba.org; Andrew Tridgell
Subject: RE: [cifs-protocol] FW: FW: Inconsistencies in ad-schema docs and text 
files SRX090109601490

Andrew & Tridge,

   I finished reviewing the changes you made to the schema file in order to 
join Windows 2008R2 to Samba domain.   For the attributes affected,  from my 
initial review of MS-ADA*/MS-ADSC and code, they will probably result in many 
change requests to schema documentation.  We will make sure that any correction 
you made will be properly reflected in the documentation after confirmation 
from the product team.   We really appreciate the information you passed back 
to us, which is really valuable for us to improve schema documentation.  

   Looking back at the history of the request , the previous delivery of a 
single  schema text file  combined from the AD* documents is not intended as a 
permanent process of releasing and maintaining schemas in separate documents, 
rather a temporary solution to provide a good starting point to unblock your 
development.   But we did request the product team to evaluate the possibility  
for them to create and maintain the separate schema files.   We will let you 
know when there is any update on this.   By the way,  there is an entry in our 
team blog site for how to relate schema to AD documentations 
(http://blogs.msdn.com/openspecification/archive/2009/06/26/using-the-windows-server-protocols-documentation-set-to-better-understand-the-active-directory-schema.aspx).

Thanks!

Hongwei


-----Original Message-----
From: Andrew Bartlett [mailto:abart...@samba.org] 
Sent: Monday, January 11, 2010 2:42 PM
To: Hongwei Sun
Cc: p...@tridgell.net; cifs-proto...@samba.org; Andrew Tridgell
Subject: RE: [cifs-protocol] FW: FW: Inconsistencies in ad-schema docs and text 
files SRX090109601490

On Mon, 2010-01-11 at 15:23 +0000, Hongwei Sun wrote:
> Andrew,
> 
>   Most of the issues mentioned in your mail have been fixed in the latest 
> released MS-ADSC or MS-ADA3.  The following is a summary.
    
>      The schema of Windows 2008 R2 we sent you in 04/24/2009 doesn't 
> incorporate the above changes.  I will work on it.  We do have tools/scripts 
> to create and validate the schema.

Is there a location where you continually post the text file version of the 
schema, or do we have to ask each time?

Also, have you addressed the issues tridge mentioned in his reply, and the 
adminDescription/adminDisplayName issue?

Andrew Bartlett

-- 
Andrew Bartlett                                http://samba.org/~abartlet/
Authentication Developer, Samba Team           http://samba.org
Samba Developer, Cisco Inc.

_______________________________________________
cifs-protocol mailing list
cifs-protocol@cifs.org
https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/cifs-protocol

Reply via email to