Tridge & Andrew, I am owning this request now. I will investigate it and let you know. Bt the way, I already responded to the initial questions from Andrew in a separate mail.
Thanks! Hongwei -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of [email protected] Sent: Friday, January 08, 2010 2:05 PM To: John Dunning Cc: CIFS Protocol; Andrew Bartlett Subject: Re: [cifs-protocol] FW: FW: Inconsistencies in ad-schema docs and text files SRX090109601490 Hi John, You can see the patch against the W2K8-R2 schema here: http://build.samba.org/?function=diff;tree=samba_4_0_test;date=1262935494;revision=ad11deb9bd825d699e2b6799b40d98c28c95910e These were the changes that we made to allow the schema from WSPP to operate correctly with a W2K8-R2 windows client joining a Samba domain using DCPROMO. As Andrew mentioned, the curious thing is that there were some obvious typos in the schema (eg. isRecycled -> isRecyled). Perhaps you could test the schema file for a future release by comparing it to schema on a windows box? Thanks! Cheers, Tridge _______________________________________________ cifs-protocol mailing list [email protected] https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/cifs-protocol _______________________________________________ cifs-protocol mailing list [email protected] https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/cifs-protocol
