On Tue, 2010-06-29 at 09:06 +0000, Bill Wesse wrote: > Thanks Andrew. > > Richard's mail of Apr 24 2009 > (http://lists.samba.org/archive/cifs-protocol/2009-April/000740.html) > contained schema text that has definitely been superseded by the ones > I sent you yesterday. I am *fairly* sure those I send yesterday are > the latest & greatest, and should know for sure later today. > > Thanks for offering to end the patches / ldapcmp tool - for the > moment, that won't be necessary.
OK. Do at least use source4/scripting/python/samba/ms_schema.py - it will save you a lot of time trying to turn these back into ldif you might have a hope of comparing with a real server. > Do you have Richard's attachment to fwd back to me? I'm already up to > quite a few file collections, and should first diff what he sent > against what I sent before thinking about proceeding further. The links to those are in the archive links I posted. > It's Ok with me to keep cifs-protocol in the loop. I may have to do > that manually on any responses, I'm not sure if our incident > management software can target outbound emails to multiple addresses > (it's evolving, and I've been offline from it for ~2 months). > I am also awaiting confirmation for posting those latest schema text > files to our team blog. That should happen by early next week. Thanks, Andrew Bartlett -- Andrew Bartlett http://samba.org/~abartlet/ Authentication Developer, Samba Team http://samba.org Samba Developer, Cisco Inc.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ cifs-protocol mailing list [email protected] https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/cifs-protocol
