On Wed, 2010-06-30 at 11:57 +0000, Bill Wesse wrote: > Hi Andrew. I am advised that a planning meeting including the topic of > where we intend to post the schema text files is scheduled for next > Tuesday (July 6). I will advise you on the results as soon as I can > after that (it is occurring very late in the day, my time).
OK. Please just post them in a reply to cifs-protocol in the meantime. > Meanwhile, I am currently waiting for confirmation on the latest file > dates for the schema files we have provided. I expect to have that > info within the next day or so. OK. Can you give me some indication as to your level of confidence that the latest files match what is actually found in the respective AD versions? I just want to set my expectations correctly before I start trying to have Samba load them. > Also, there are some limits on our support level for the schema text > files – I will also advise you on that (query in progress…). I'm sorry to hear about the limitations on the support for the schema files. We only ask for them because we found the PDF documents to be both inaccurate and unusable for the purpose for which they purport to be provided (the creation of interoperable implementations). We do appreciate the extra effort that has gone into providing them, and getting them under an acceptable licence, but it is only by the provision of text-format schema that we have been able to show how deficient the documentation has been in the first place. I still don't understand how so many errors crept into a document that should be no more than a reformat of a direct extract from the version control system for the relevant AD versions. Andrew Bartlett -- Andrew Bartlett http://samba.org/~abartlet/ Authentication Developer, Samba Team http://samba.org Samba Developer, Cisco Inc.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ cifs-protocol mailing list [email protected] https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/cifs-protocol
