Well, yes, BUT the point is people have procedures set up to build this automatically for years and now all of a sudden they will have to install more software. Probably not a good idea.
On Mon, Dec 2, 2024 at 4:40 PM Andrew Randrianasulu <[email protected]> wrote: > > > вт, 3 дек. 2024 г., 02:36 Phyllis Smith <[email protected]>: > >> Unfortunately, it won't even build when I add: --with-onevpl on the >> configure line: >> configure: error: requires onevpl support. >> make: *** No targets specified and no makefile found. Stop. >> >> This is my 6 year old AMD laptop. >> > > you need to install > > https://github.com/intel/libvpl > > I used 2.13 for my dummy tests, but something down to 2.6 (I think) should > work, at least as build requirement. > > > > >>> >>> >>> >> On Mon, Dec 2, 2024 at 4:01 PM Terje J. Hanssen <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> >>> Den 02.12.2024 23:32, skrev Phyllis Smith: >>> >>> Adding OneVPL by default, which only works on the latest Intel computers >>> and not on older ones or AMD, would not be a good idea; especially not for >>> the RPM packaging. That is my opinion based on our attempt to keep CinGG >>> generically usable on older computers and even 32-bit systems. >>> >>> >>> I didn't think "onevpl on" would prohibit other than Intel hardware to >>> work as else, and that hwaccell work or not, dependent of the platform >>> support. >>> Actually my thought was to test what legacy Intel hardware are good for. >>> Is possibly a Cingg user-switch possible instead? >>> >>> >>> >>> I have yet to go through the last 5 attachment patches that Andrew >>> graciously put all in one place for viability on all systems. >>> >>> On Mon, Dec 2, 2024 at 2:01 PM Terje J. Hanssen <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Den 30.11.2024 01:03, skrev Andrew Randrianasulu: >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> сб, 30 нояб. 2024 г., 01:07 Phyllis Smith via Cin < >>>> [email protected]>: >>>> >>>>> Andrew, should these and the QSV presets be checked into GIT now that >>>>> Terje has tested them on his specific hardware? >>>>> >>>> >>>> yes, but 10bit ones require patch for themselves and recent one >>>> removing addition of ildct flag for some qsv encoders .... >>>> >>>> >>>> "Exp: do not set ildct flag for qsv_av1/h264/vp9" >>>> 0001-yet-another-10bit-attempt.patch >>>> 0002-Hopefully-wire-up-various-cin_pix_fmt-for-vaapi-enco.patch >>>> >>>> re-attached so you do not need to hunt them in mailthreads .... >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Is the onevpl patch already included in the buildsystem? >>>> It was said it was "default to off", so I wonder if it will be >>>> available or "on" in the upcoming rpm? >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> I also have mediacodec/termux related profiles, and one hackfix for >>>> mjpegtools failing to build here on clang. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>> P.S. There will not be new Appimages created at the end of this month, >>>>> but will wait until December. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Tue, Nov 26, 2024 at 3:52 PM Terje J. Hanssen < >>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Attached tested vaapi hwaccel presets as gzip'd tar file >>>>>> >>>>>> av1_vaapi_10b420.mp4 >>>>>> av1_vaapi_10b420.webm >>>>>> av1_vaapi_8b420.mp4 >>>>>> av1_vaapi_8b420.webm >>>>>> h264_vaapi_8b420.mp4 >>>>>> hevc_vaapi_10b420.mp4 >>>>>> hevc_vaapi_10b422.mp4 >>>>>> hevc_vaapi_8b420.mp4 >>>>>> vp9_vaapi_10b420.mp4 >>>>>> vp9_vaapi_10b420.webm >>>>>> vp9_vaapi_8b420.mp4 >>>>>> vp9_vaapi_8b420.webm >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>> Cin mailing list >>>>> [email protected] >>>>> https://lists.cinelerra-gg.org/mailman/listinfo/cin >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>
-- Cin mailing list [email protected] https://lists.cinelerra-gg.org/mailman/listinfo/cin
