On Sat, 2008-05-17 at 01:03 +0200, Ichthyostega wrote: > Thorsten Wilms schrieb: > > Well, it would make perfect sense to add per region effects to Ardour ;) > > of course it would be nice... I'd love it ;-) > as well as crossfades between more then two adjacent clips, > and effects spanning several clips, ... > -- and then where would you put the automation? and how should this > fit in with the concept of "playlists" and "diskstreams" Ardour > builds upon?
You could just have automation tracks that are not tied to other tracks. That should allow controlling several things with one automation track and processing stages between automation and destinations. In short: free routing and plugins for automation. With both an extended Ardour or something from scratch, it should be considered to have objects on the timeline that represent the lifespan of plugins and connections. I agree that video leads to requirements that reach into the audio realm. Without a doubt making an app that is good at both video and audio is extra hard. It's just that you would need an insane amount of work to get even close to Ardour's audio editing and routing capabilities. Given a special interest in music videos, I see a hard separation of editing audio and editing video as a problem. -- Thorsten Wilms thorwil's design for free software: http://thorwil.wordpress.com/ _______________________________________________ Cinelerra mailing list [email protected] https://init.linpro.no/mailman/skolelinux.no/listinfo/cinelerra
