That raises a good question...if an NPE-400 with 2000 PPPoA and 35 PPPoE operates at 44% today, what would a G2 bring that down to?
Frank -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Clayton Zekelman Sent: Tuesday, April 17, 2007 7:08 PM To: ; [email protected] Subject: Re: [c-nsp] 7200 / NPE-G2 I'm running one with Version 12.4(4)XD4. So far 15 weeks of uptime, no issues with 924 L2TP, and 762 PPPoE sessions - 24% CPU Utilization. Come to think of it, I would have thought I'd be seeing a bit better performance. ----- Original Message --------------- Subject: [c-nsp] 7200 / NPE-G2 From: " " <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2007 10:27:02 -0400 To: [email protected] >Does anyone have experience/feedback that they're willing to share on >the moderately new G2 engine ? I suspect that software is more of a >wild card than the hardware itself. Does anyone have an opinion on >whether one is better off with 12.4.11T or 12.2SB ? >_______________________________________________ >cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] >https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp >archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
