> > [The 2948G-L3] really was meant to be an L3 device - You had to do BVI's to > > put a vlan on multiple ports. The FE ports couldn't do ACLs - You had > > a 'special command' to force traffic to route out of the GE port and back > > again to apply ACLs there. > > Right. It was somewhat like the 8500's in these regards, just less flexible. > > So you do ACL's on the GE uplinks (something like you would have had to do > with the 8540, for instance, if the 16 port FE card didn't have the ACL > daughterboard) and don't do them on the FE ports. For most usage that's not > to terrible of a limit. The non-Catalyst-like VLAN setup is probably the > most odd thing about them (again, they are very much 8500-like in that > regard). > > I was mostly curious if someone had had issues with them, other than these > documented limitations.
Plenty of bugs. *Especially* if you actually tried to use them for L2. The 2948G-L3 is dead, and deservedly so. Steinar Haug, Nethelp consulting, [EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
