Maybe rather than switchport he wanted to place the interfaces in a bridge group, perhaps with BVI? Makes me squirm to think why someone might want to do that, but I occasionally find (and have to dismantle) such mistakes.
Pelle wrote: > On Tue, Jun 26, 2007 at 11:16:39PM +0300, Hank Nussbacher wrote: > > >> Where can I find a Cisco page that shows which IOS versions that >> support switchport capability (specifically for 871, 1841, 2501, 2514 >> and 2610)? >> > > 871: yes for the LAN-ports, no for the WAN port > 1841: yes, if equipped with a EtherSwitch-module, e.g. WIC-4ESW or > HWIC-4ESW > 25xx: no > 2610: maybe, if equipped with the EtherSwitch-module WIC-4ESW and it's > supported (don't know that) > > in general, all (H)WIC's which are branded as "Ethernet Switching > module" does "switchport". in addition the routers in the 87x series and > 180x is shipped with this module integrated. > > BUT, the Vlan-range supported are the old ISL-range (1-1005). if you use > a pre 12.4(11)T IOS, all Vlans are configured in the ancient Vlan > database. from 12.4(11)T transparent mode is supported. > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp > archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
