A 3550/3560 etherchanneled to the 5000/5500 would be a dirt cheap way to get multi-gigabit performance, if your routing protocol, table size, and features aren't too demanding...
Chuck -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jason Alert Sent: Friday, August 10, 2007 11:26 AM To: Troy Beisigl; [email protected] Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Catalyst 5500 RSM speed limitations. 400Mbps is the connection speed between the RSM and the switch. 150Mbps is close to the performance limit. If your design permits, you can run more than 1 RSM and split the routing up. Otherwise, you're better off setting up a router-on-a-stick like Gert suggested. Jason Alert VC3 Inc. -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Troy Beisigl Sent: Thursday, August 09, 2007 5:29 PM To: [email protected] Subject: [c-nsp] Catalyst 5500 RSM speed limitations. Does anyone know what the total bandwidth limitations are on the WS-X5302? I know that the chassis reports that it can do 400Mbps, but I am seeing packet loss and high latency when pushing 150Mbps on it. Aside from moving to a more current platform, are there any other RSM modules that can handle more than what this one can? Troy Beisigl Network Director I2B Networks, Inc 858-715-8500 X 1005 _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
