Jon Lewis wrote: > On Mon, 29 Oct 2007, Adrian Minta wrote: > >>> 1. Handling approximately 500Mbps each way (about 1Gbp total >>> throughput) >>> 2. Handling BGP peerings with up to 20 peers with total of 200-300 >>> prefixes >>> 3. Complete BGP support (communities, filtering etc.) >>> 4. Of course boxes are basically acting as router, so both ports are >>> separate L3 ports. >>> >> C3560 and c3750 are both switches witch means line rate speeds as long >> as your number of routes is smaller than TCAM size. One prefix more and >> everything goes kaboom. >> I suggest to take a look at Cisco 7201 router. > > Why? 300 routes on a 3560 is nothing. I've done around 1300 routes > and 2-3 BGP peers on a 3550. 20 peers seems like maybe a lot, but as > long as they're all reasonably stable, I suspect it'd work and be much > cheaper than a 7201. Are you sure that nobody is accidentally injecting more routes ? You will always be on the edge. C3550 was a better switch than C3560 IMHO.
-- Best regards, Adrian Minta _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
