Hello, i'm using cisco 3750g with 40 bgp peers, cca 3000 prefixes with about 300mbit/s in peaks. Load is constantly during whole day on 6% with sdm routing template. c3750g is the same as c3560g without stacking I think.
Best regards, Jan Hrabcak ----- Original Message ----- From: "Adrian Minta" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "'Cisco Mailing list'" <[email protected]> Sent: Tuesday, October 30, 2007 6:10 PM Subject: Re: [c-nsp] c3560 L3 throughput with BGP > Howard Leadmon wrote: >>> On Mon, 29 Oct 2007, Adrian Minta wrote: >>> You will always be on the edge. C3550 was a better switch than C3560 >>> IMHO. >>> >>> -- >>> Best regards, >>> Adrian Minta >>> >> >> >> I am curious why you feel the 3550 is better than the 3560? Any factual >> reason, or just a matter of personal preference for some reason. >> >> I have a 3560G, and it's been running like a champ a long time.. >> >> >> --- >> Howard Leadmon >> > > I replaced a 3550 non G with 3560 non G. The config was the same (copy & > paste). > On 3550 average CPU load was below 1%. On 3560 the load was always above > 5% with spikes up to 60%. > After some googling I change the sdm template. The load went down, but > above 5%. I put extensive ACL's on all the routed port and finally CPU > stabilized to around 5%. The load is caused by "IP Input" and "HL3U > bkgrd". > My feeling is that C decided to discourage the use of c3560 for routing > and somehow they reduce the switch fabric. > > -- > Best regards, > Adrian Minta > > > > _______________________________________________ > cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp > archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ > _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
