Jon Lewis wrote: > On Thu, 7 Feb 2008, Robert Hass wrote: > >> Can I configure something to prevent this drops ? Or maybe I should >> replace this card with WS-X6148 will resolve my problem ? > > According to cisco docs, the per port buffers on the 6148 are no better. > WS-X6548-RJ-45 has 1MB/port buffers. We had a 6500 with a busy FE port, > and swapping from a WS-X6348-RJ-45 to a WS-X6548-RJ-45 made a big > difference in the output drops (but didn't totally stop them). > > http://cio.cisco.com/en/US/products/hw/switches/ps708/products_module_configuration_guide_chapter09186a0080394e16.html
Another option to consider would be the 6148A model. http://tinyurl.com/2uom4p The 6148A model has 5.3MB of buffer per port whereas the plain 6148 only has 128KB. That might suit his needs too. I always make a point to use 6748s but that would be a waste of money given the Sup Robert has to work with. Justin _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
