Hi,

I think Cisco hopes that you would "migrate" them from VPN3K and PIX to ASA (or IOS) ;-)

I happened to stumble on the same "where do I find a 64 bit vpn client for vista" recently and a short investigation resulted in "please look into implementing anyconnect vpn instead of expecting 64 bit vpn client for vista". Since there is a 64 bit linux implementation of the vpn client and there is a 32 bit vista client that kind of works I would assume this has more to do with someone deciding they want us, the customers, to pay for those nifty little SSL licenses (you get a few with your ASA, the rest you have to pay for unlike ipsec licenses that you get a bunch of) than technical issues with implementing it on the 64 bit network stack.

For anyone attempting to implement Anyconnect with group attributes from RADIUS remember to read through CSCsk80264 before starting - it will save you a lot of grief. The 8.0 reference documentation (table E-5) is wrong and the error you will get from your ASA is something along the lines of "Unable to add SVC to ... " and "Internal Error (34 => 34)" even with very heavy vpn-sessiondb and webvpn debug enabled. The OS X client also identifies itself as a Windows client ("sh vpn-sess de svc") for one of the tunnel types (TLS or DTLS), that was also pretty hilarious.

As a technology, or as an implementation, Anyconnect 2.0/2.1 does not seem as robust as the ipsec vpn client especially if network connectivity is a bit flaky. I support guys who are in a bunch of different places (Qatar, somewhere in Australia ;-), Malaysia, etc.) and where the ipsec client shines is that it works semi-reliably even with very high latencies (2+ seconds) and variable packet loss.

Also.. on the webvpn side, what happened in 8.0 to ASA customization? "customize foo" is deprecated and does not seem to result in anything anymore (in 7.2 that worked). Now there seems to be some kind of xml importing tool instead or the assumption that everybody is to use ASDM for administration. I could not find any documentation on CCO on the new format.

:)


On Feb 14, 2008, at 06:33, Jonathan Charles wrote:

OK, umm... what do I do for customers that have PIXes and VPN Concentrators? Those will not support SSL VPN....


Jonathan

On Feb 13, 2008 9:59 PM, Jules Rogers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
There will be no 64-bit version of the standard VPN client.  There's
only the AnyConnect client.  You might be able to try using
Microsoft's built in IPSEC.


--
Jules Rogers

-----
With or without religion, you would have good people doing good things
and evil people doing evil things. But for good people to do evil
things, that takes religion.
 - Steven Weinberg

On Feb 13, 2008 9:29 PM, Jonathan Charles <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

I have a lot of users using Dell Precision Workstations with upwards
of 8GB of RAM and are running 64-bit XP and Vista, and they can't get
the Cisco VPN client to work...

Does Cisco have any intention of supporting 64-bit for the VPN Client?



Jonathan
_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list  [email protected]
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/


_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list  [email protected]
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/




HTH

Kaj
--
Kaj J. Niemi
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
+358 45 63 12000



_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list  [email protected]
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/

Reply via email to