>
> Certainly Cisco must (should) have had numbers demonstrating the split
> was reasonable, and it's possible the group of people on this list,
> myself included, who dislike the split are a self-selecting minority.
>
> It doesn't mean I have to like it though.

Time and customers will show if this split was a good decision.

But the whole thing reminds me the DEC TOPS-10 / TOPS-20 / VAX war, the 
DEC "we are a hardware company" etc.

Hopefully Cisco has read this IT history chapter (alt.sys.pdp10) and will 
not repeat the same mistakes.

--John
_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list  [email protected]
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/

Reply via email to