The reality though is that both JunOS and Cisco IOS have their quirks. Having used both I find it hard to believe anyone can actually justify that JunOS is "more intuitive" than Cisco IOS. JunOS does have some cooler features, that I will definitely admit.
-- Regards, Jason Plank CCIE #16560 e: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -------------- Original message ---------------------- From: Florian Weimer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > * Jonathan Crawford: > > > I do have to agree with Ben on this one... shutdown/negation of > > shutdown is one of the last things I would say is > > counter-intuitive... with JunOS the equivalent would be "deactivate > > interfaces ge-0/0/0" to shutdown ge-0/0/0. They are active by > > default when you create the entries for them and commit, but to > > activate a deactivated... it is just "activate interface ..." > > Uhm, no. A deactivated configuration item is considered not to be > present in the configuration at all, which means you cannot reference > that interface anywhere else in the configuration (that would be an > error that prevents you from committing the change). If you want to > shut down an interface (while keeping it in the configuration), you > need to disable it, and the equivalent of "no shutdown" in that sense > is "delete disable". > > Talk about intuitive... > > -- > Florian Weimer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > BFK edv-consulting GmbH http://www.bfk.de/ > Kriegsstraße 100 tel: +49-721-96201-1 > D-76133 Karlsruhe fax: +49-721-96201-99 > _______________________________________________ > cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp > archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
_______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
