Of course we also have "no neighbor x.x.x.x peer-group MYPEERS", which rather than disassociating the neighbor from the peer group, will instead do the same as "no neighbor x.x.x.x".
Ben Steele wrote: > That seems very intuitive to me, as soon as you understand that "no > xxxx" in IOS removes/negates "xxxx", means less commands which makes > sense. > > Unless the term shutdown doesn't seem clear in an interface? I would > assume it does to the majority of people though, IOS familiar or not. > > On 11/04/2008, at 3:43 PM, Jeremy Stretch wrote: > >> Tolstykh, Andrew wrote: >>> Cisco IOS is in fact extremely intuitive, there is nothing intuitive >>> about the JunOS IMHO. >> I can't speak on JunOS, but considering that the IOS command to enable >> an interface is "no shutdown," IOS may not be as intuitive as you >> think. >> >> stretch >> http://packetlife.net >> _______________________________________________ >> cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] >> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp >> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ > > _______________________________________________ > cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp > archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ > _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
