Should work fine (though, admittedly, I haven't deployed this config).
The purpose of PAgP+ is to provide dual-active detection should the VSL
between your VSS pair fail. If your devices don't support PAgP+, you
need to configure a dedicated link to perform this detection instead.
See
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/prod/collateral/switches/ps5718/ps9336/prod_white_paper0900aecd806ee2ed_ps2797_Products_White_Paper.html
Holemans Wim wrote:
Can someone clarify the PAGP problem ? I had a discussion with someone
of Cisco for a new design in one of our datarooms and we had chosen a
VSS solution with dual 3750E stacks and 20Gig uplinks in each rack to
the VSS chassis for max redundantie. According to our Cisco contact,
this was a working solution. If however it is impossible to make
channels between a 3750E cluster and both switches in a VSS, the
complete design has to be redone...
Wim Holemans
Network Services
University of Antwerp
-----Original Message-----
From: Mike Louis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, July 29, 2008 6:19 PM
To: Teller, Robert; Tony Varriale; [email protected]
Subject: RE: [c-nsp] 6509 ACE/FWSM Modules??????????
Last time I checked the 3750 did not support the pagp extensions for
vss. You would get an stp loop if you tried. Has this support changed?
_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected]
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected]
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
