There was a point to point configuration on the link itself and it caused a bunch of platform forwarding problems once.
I wouldn't use that one. Note I'm not talking about the OSPF point to point control plane configuration. Rodney On Wed, Aug 20, 2008 at 07:43:51PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > These are all good points, and makes me wonder - if it's *known* that an > > > Ethernet link will be used as a point to point link between two routers, > > > why doesn't everybody configure it explicitly as a point to point link? > > > I know we always do... > > > > The benefit/cost ratio is low. You aren't saving much be eliminating DR/BDR > > election, and it's just one more unnecessary tweak to keep track of. IMHO. > > Funny, we look at it exactly the opposite way. We're a service provider, > and a large majority of the Ethernet links where we run an IGP are point > to point links. So we have the point to point configuration as part of > our standard config template, nothing extra to keep track of. > > Steinar Haug, Nethelp consulting, [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > _______________________________________________ > cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp > archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
