> > Funny, we look at it exactly the opposite way. We're a service provider, > > and a large majority of the Ethernet links where we run an IGP are point > > to point links. So we have the point to point configuration as part of > > our standard config template, nothing extra to keep track of. > > I agree that it makes a lot of sense, but what's the failure mode in the > event that configuration is missing on one side, or that a network-type > configured as point-to-point is multiaccess?
As far as I can see: - Missing on one side: OSPF adjacency won't come up. - Multiaccess: We use /30 on our point to point Ethernet links. A third router on a multiaccess segment should lead to address conflicts, again preventing OSPF adjacency. Steinar Haug, Nethelp consulting, [EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
